Get answers from academic experts to any study-related questions.
There has been a decline in the rates of crime in Canada. The main three reasons that have contributed to this include: The age cohort of Canada is changing and the population is growing old to commit crimes. People aged past 65 are more than younger people. Most of the...
Crime is a form of deviant behavior to the extent of violating social laws. Unlike deviance, crime relates to violating the laws in a constitution or a government, while deviance involves violating society’s rules, norms, and convictions. Crime is the same for a certain region or country, while deviance may...
According to Reiman, drugs are the intense stimulations of violence. Moreover, people who tend to be addicted to drugs often experience behavioral manifestations such as escapism. It leads to enhanced depression and aggression levels caused by other factors such as social push or humiliation. As a result of the emotional...
The decline in drug-related crime is conditioned by the fact that drugs have recently become out-fashioned. The legalization of particular medications helping to reduce depression also can contribute to the decline of drug-related crimes. Medications are designed not to stimulate aggression but to balance negative and positive emotions. However, Leighton...
Street and white-collar crimes are two unlawful actions that significantly affect the welfare of the country. These two types of crimes are different in nature: the first one is more physically violent while the second is immoral. From my point of view, both of them should be addressed by governmental...
The most rational theories addressing the causes of crimes are biological and sociological. The first one emphasizes the genetic predisposition to committing crimes. This theory also highlights the role of aggression as one of the inherent features of human nature leading to crimes. The sociological theory considers the social push...
Anomie in criminological theory is treated as the person’s inability to choose lawful activities over crime. It is usually caused by the social push that corners the criminal and severely harms their mental state. As a result, people think that the only way to gain prosperity is illegal. Economic and...
Community policing significantly improves the relations between the police and members of a minority community. Planning joint crime prevention activities helps to reduce the number of crimes among minorities. Due to the close contact between the police and representatives of minority nations, both sides have the opportunity to understand and...
The term community policing means involving citizens in joint activities with the police. The Public Security Police deals with the issues of ensuring the safety of citizens, public security, protection of property, public order, detection, prevention and suppression of crimes and administrative offenses, and disclosure of crimes. Community policing is...
In my opinion, there is a difference between “police community programs” and community policing. The essence of the “police community programs” is to involve citizens in joint activities with the police, therefore, it consists more of the initiative of the citizens themselves. At the same time, “police community programs” are...
Gerald (“Jerry”) Gault, 15, was charged on June 8, 1964, with making an indecent phone call to a neighbor, Mrs. Cook. Gault and his friend, Ronald Lewis, were detained and brought to the Children’s Detention Home after Mrs. Cook filed a complaint. Gault was on probation when he was caught...
Child abuse is a concern addressed at both the state and federal levels. The Child Abuse Prevention and Treatment Act (CAPTA) is the regulatory body that considers child abuse at the federal level. CAPTA includes physical, neglect, sexual abuse, emotional abuse, parental substance abuse, and abandonment. However, even with CAPTA,...
In some jurisdictions, the law allows minors to make decisions regarding their treatment specialties. These individuals are called mature minors as they are recognized by the Court as wise enough to understand the benefits and the risks of the treatment proposed to them. However, if the child lacks the capacity...
Protectionist theory frames the rights of the children preventing various types of minor abuse. The experiences children go through impact their further well-being. It is in the interest of every citizen to protect the rights and safety of children and teenagers. The protectionist theory provides minors with equal rights and...
In the United States, there are four primary sources of law. The major origin of public legislation includes the Constitution, federal and state statutes, administrative regulations, and case outcomes. According to Schowalter, the US Constitution is considered the supreme legal authority. In other words, if other laws contradict this one,...
Kaitlyn Schoen does not believe that it is wrong to exercise free speech in opposition to a government policy. She claims that the government should not be able to silence anyone opposed to its actions or policies. She, again, insists that the key argument is presenting danger. However, the degree...
One’s opinion on this question is a purely preferential matter. Kaitlyn Schoen’s answer is that the government should not silence opinions as long as they do not present a threat to anyone. While I agree with that opinion on the grounds of a general principle, I do not think that...
In his activities, Mr. Schenck attempted to follow the spirit of the law, but he failed to follow its letter. I share Kaitlyn Schoen’s opinion that Schenck’s leaflet was not protected under the Constitutional because of the Espionage Act. In fact, it is the Espionage Act that Mr. Schenck and...
The matter under discussion is a complicated and sensitive one. Kaitlyn Schoen claims that Justice Holmes’ opinion was justified and that Freedom of Speech could be restricted in case of danger. I, too, personally feel that Justice Holmes’ opinion had its reasons dictated by the situation in the country at...
There are several types of real, personal, and intellectual properties. Under personal property, tangible, listed, and intangible assets are featured. Whereas personal tangible property encompasses all physical assets such as land and machinery, intangible assets majorly comprise bonds and marketable securities in the financial and money markets. Bonds and debentures...
The process of initiating a civil case in a federal court involves the litigant filing a complaint with the court. He then delivers a written copy of the allegations against the accused. The lawsuit outlines all the injuries, losses, and damages incurred by the plaintiff, explaining how the defendant caused...
The main factors that determine whether a case will be heard by the federal or state are the type of parties involved and the nature of the accusation. The national charter of a given country plays a key role in determining the type of cases to be handled by the...
The answer to this question remains heavily up in the air, as demonstrated by the history of negotiations between several judges throughout the proceedings of this case. The relevance of United States v. Jones rests in the Court’s Fourth Amendment jurisprudence’s back and forth between reliance on the trespass-based criterion...
When the government physically enters someone’s home, it has conducted a Fourth Amendment “search.” Furthermore, the home is considered to be the most important location free from unreasonable government interference, and the curtilage surrounding the home is also considered part of the home for Fourth Amendment purposes. The police violated...
When assessing the facts of the case, the Court ruled that the installation of the GPS device on the defendant’s vehicle and its subsequent use in tracking the vehicle’s trajectory can be defined as a search. Hence, the government has invaded private property with the clear goal of obtaining information...
No, Chad Weisgram didn’t have a good reason to appeal after the final decision. The Court of Appeal already ruled in favor of Marley Co based on the evidence and scientific justification. The plaintiff and the defendant relied on the scientific nature of their arguments since it was about the...
While some legislative changes tend to be debatable and might lead to adverse outcomes, some changes might be effective and helpful. Concerning the 2018 legislative changes, there are several amendments that will have a meaningful impact on law enforcement operations. In this respect, the first is House Bill 511, which...
The majority of states have passed bills to expand the categories of violators and felonies suitable for transfer from juvenile to adult court of law for further trials and prospective prison sentences. This is done in an attempt to enhance the punitive measures for severe juvenile offenses. These regulations reduced...
It is fair to say that it is much easier for the US president to form and conduct foreign policy than domestic policy. One of the reasons for this fact is that in external affairs, the support of Congress is often not necessary, whereas, in internal affairs, it is necessary...
Litigation involves a method in which a dispute between two parties is resolved by court order for a judgment. However, because of the rigidity and high cost involved in litigation, there are cases where the parties go to arbitration. Arbitration is a process for resolving a dispute between the parties...
Differences between death principles and dying are explored in Bill C-14, Canada’s draft law on medical support in death. The law is probably the outcome of a shift in bioethical concepts from dignity to conditional sanctity of human life to life quality. Life has inherent value, per the sacredness of...
I believe that successful reentry depends on many factors, among which changing perceptions and social supervision are the most important. Prisoners tend to be seen in a negative light after their release, not like people who need help but as offenders, one should keep away from it. This perception effectively...
I believe the two most effective rehabilitation programs are social therapy and psychological programs. Social therapy presupposes the restoration of prisoners’ social ties and the legal status of a citizen. It is effective since it allows to resolution actual needs of prisoners, at the same time resolving issues that may...
The work of a correctional officer, while relatively well-paid, is strictly defined by prison authorities. Officers are given a set of tasks they perform which rarely changes. I agree with the paragraph that entry to this job is easy as few people want to work in prison. However, I disagree...
Some of the lingering issues around the ADA include procedures, policies, and practices of law enforcement, curb rumps, and effective communication. The local and federal governments have failed to fully modify some laws, regulations, and ordinances to alleviate any form of discrimination against individuals with disabilities. Consequently, enforcement of these...
Any form of discrimination is unacceptable regardless of its motive or goals. Individuals with disabilities are the most victims of discrimination in social and employment places. Discriminating against people because of being physically disadvantaged has adverse impacts on personal, social, and economic well-being. For instance, victims of such kinds of...
The documentary Food Chains generally blames giant supermarkets, which push farmers to sell their goods at reduced rates, resulting in unequal compensation for their employees. The film depicts the Coalition of Immokalee Workers in Florida, a union of tomato pickers on a hunger strike against the prominent Publix grocery business....
I can safely assert that Law, Ethics, and Governance turned out to be one of the most significant and relevant courses for me during my studies. Cases of actual companies and corporate scandals played a notable role in the assimilation of the material. Based on my career ambitions and personal...
In the case of being privately retained by a parent’s attorney, the evaluator is primarily concerned with ensuring that the child ends up in the custody of the most capable parent. The child’s physical and mental well-being, as well as their balanced development, is central to the evaluation, and the...
Chapters 11 through 14 of Stahl’s work, “Conducting child custody evaluations: From basic to complex issues,” cover the various issues the process of granting custody can entail. The first chapter discusses the climate of high-conflict families, where the parents are unable to resolve their personal issues and provide the child...
Using the assistance of a forensic expert is a significant asset in addressing civil and criminal cases that warrant the attention of an expert. Forensic specialists may be either appointed by the court or retained by one’s attorney. In both cases, there are some significant differences in their operation, and...
The main advantage of NCVS over UCR and NIBRS is that they provide a profile of criminal incidents that are not reported or reported to the police. NCVS provides an opportunity to understand specific criminal trends that are taking place in society. The information received concerns the perpetrator in the...
NCVS can cause concern to a criminal justice leader as it does not track crime that affects American youth. In the National Crime Victimization Survey, coverage by age is limited because the data do not include cases of victimization that occur with people under 11 years of age. So inaccurate...
Articles that are different in their content and goals impact the development of criminal justice public policy as they are studies of new realities to which the government is forced to respond. Liang, in his article, notes that since the advent of the Internet in China, its influence on people’s...
This article examines the “stop snitching” phenomenon and concludes that it is quite widespread. Being a cultural code of mentality, this phenomenon is seen as the result of mistrust of the official authorities that have been taking root in people’s minds for decades. An emphasis here is on resolving personal...
A college education is important for police officers because it helps them develop critical thinking and problem-solving skills. Moreover, it reduces competition because people with a college degree are better skilled in making decisions and have higher proficiency in technology than those without a degree. A college degree improves a...
Law enforcement misconduct can be heavily fueled by police subculture, which leads to police organizational failure. The main categories of dysfunctional and disruptive police subcultures include subunit identity, cultural separation, normalized deviance, rewards, and loyalty. Subunit identity fuels law enforcement misconduct by decoupling a subunit from the core or parent...
International commercial (trade) law is a set of legal norms of international and national law that regulate the relationships that arise in the conduct of a variety of trading activities. The UNIDROIT principles represent a completely new approach to the law of international trade because they are not an international...
According to the Directive, debts must be paid immediately unless otherwise agreed in the contract. If the contract stipulates a payment period, then the debt must be paid within this period. If the contract does not stipulate a payment deadline, then payment is considered late after 30 days. The creditor...
The sources of Australian criminal law are the legislation of the Union and individual states, as well as the norms of common law. According to Australian Criminal Justice, criminal liability is one of the types of legal liability, the main content of which is the measures applied by state authorities...
Capital punishment, or the death penalty, is the sanction where the state kills an individual for a crime committed. Religious and human rights activists worldwide rose against the punishment, and many democratic nations in the world abolished the practice. The 2005 Simmons decision forbids the death penalty on people who...
Currently, society is gradually developing an understanding of the importance of ensuring human rights and freedoms as the basis of the rule of law. An effective state mechanism should function in modern society, emphasizing the priority of human rights and liberties over other values and allowing citizens to use existing...
Freedom of speech is one of the fundamental rights accorded to all Americans in the first amendment. The amendment forbids the government from punishing people for protected speech and activities. Since the USA is a diverse nation, speakers must enjoy civil liberty and learn the difference between protected and unprotected...
Crime is considered a purely social phenomenon based on the totality of acts of individual criminal behavior, overcoming their traits, and the appearance of signs common to all criminal acts. This phenomenon is social, historically changeable, mass, criminal law, and systemic. It manifests itself in the totality of socially dangerous...
The dissidents would propose contributing state-funded training to lessen the disgrace of hazardous substance use. They plan a full scope of evidence-based treatment, and they might want to change the criminal code to annul applicable compulsory least punishments. The moderates would contribute to making private medication treatment regions throughout the...
The bureaucratic degree of government manages spaces of law recorded in the Constitution Act 1867, and that greatly influences the entire country. The common government is answerable for regions recorded in the Constitution Act 1867, for example, schooling and medical care. Metropolitan states are liable for regions like nearby police....
According to 56(1) of the Controlled Drugs and Substances Act, professionals and drug specialists, approved inside their extent of training, are excluded from the accompanying arrangements and guidelines when prescribing a controlled substance to a patient or moving a remedy for a controlled substance to a drug specialist in Canada....
The Government is seized with the direness of the circumstance, has made a move, and is focused on proceeding to act to address the opioid emergency. Six general procedures can assist with combatting the arising issue. Counteraction: The Prevention mainstay of the Canadian Drugs and Substances Strategy plans to forestall...
Respect for the main rights of citizens during court procedures is the key provision incorporated into the practice. It is generally guaranteed by introducing the writ of habeas corpus, which means the opportunity to challenge imprisonment. This principle is applicable to many aspects, and the examination of the need for...
Lawsuits against government officials are complicated procedures that are guided by specific regulations. In this case, the main obstacle to meeting the plaintiffs’ needs is the necessity to get passed qualified immunity, and this aspect is critical for further discussion of violations. However, in this case, if this goal is...
The choice of a parent who will be in the custody of a child predetermines the overall well-being of the minor. Therefore, it is essential to make a reasonably informed decision based on the implications of some decisive factors. In the United States, the principle of the best interest of...
Although the child’s best interest plays a decisive role in making a court decision about custody, it is commonly unclear which parent would be able to provide the best for the child. Since the well-being of the child is prioritized, it is only natural for a judge to ask the...
The problem of deciding which parent should be given custody of the child after divorce is marked by the common view that mothers are more reliable caregivers. Silberg and Dallam state that “patriarchal beliefs remain one of the strong influences in evaluators making recommendations that imperil children’s safety,” implying that...
Sole custody holds that only one parent bears full responsibility for the child regardless of the other parent’s opinion. The parent without custody rights visits the child but cannot decide about the child’s life. The pros of such a decision include the child’s safety and the parent with custody in...
Management rights are common and legally justified practices in contract drafting. Indeed, companies, along with other parties to an employment agreement, must have officially stated rights. The separation of the competencies of the management team and the labor association is also a critical element of any contract. In this sense,...
I think that I would identify the given dismissal of the “five rights” as soon as I observed that the connectivity issue was a problem. The “five rights” are comprised of “the right patient, the right drug, the right dose, the right route, and the right time.” In other words,...
The case of Susann Bashir is one of the examples of religion-based harassment in the workplace. This is a disturbing and illegal practice, which includes verbal remarks, teasing, offensive commentary, or even physical interactions. It is hard to classify some unique incidents of such harassment as illegal or as discrimination....
Deceptive advertisement is an unethical practice that is made in order to gain more profit by misinforming the audience about the qualities of a product or a service. In addition, an advertisement that deceives the audience is considered illegal. Therefore it is important for businesses to be aware of the...
The lawsuit against Oprah Winfrey is an example of a lack of sufficient evidence and elements to cause action. The plaintiff wanted to sue Winfrey for the intentional infliction of emotional distress after making statements about her disappointment in the headmaster’s performance. The educational institution for impoverished girls has Oprah...
The case of Christina Eilman is devastating. Regardless of the cause of her initial disturbance at the airport, the decision to take her from the airport and then drop her off in the unsafe neighborhood must be explained by the police officer. A lawsuit against the city and police officer...
Different types of ownership are designed to fit into different life circumstances. Therefore, we’ll analyze the most desirable circumstances for choosing joint tenancy, tenancy in common, or tenancy by the entirety. Joint tenancy is a type of property ownership that is most commonly associated with real estate. Two or more...
The land is a unique type of property that is subjected to specific laws and regulations. Therefore, ownership of land that may be transferred might be different from the transferring of regular property. First of all, there are restrictions that apply to land use. As such, there are restrictive covenants,...
Administrative agencies play an important role in the functioning of a government. Their main two functions include executive functions and legislative functions. The legislative function is associated with creating regulations that implement the statutes that are created by Congress. Therefore, the role of administrative agencies is to design a body...
There are laws and regulations that ensure that employers do not discriminate against workers on the basis of age, gender, race, religion, or ethnic origin. For example, there is the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967, which provides protection to workers 40 years of age and older from employment...
Federal whistleblower policy implies protection from retaliation of staff who brings credible information on illegal practices. However, despite the benefits the policy provides, it has two considerable limitations that might prevent an employee from sharing the details. The first is reduced employment prospects because of the attention to a whistleblower...
Criminal justice policy is constantly changing; policymakers rely on a number of factors, among which are public opinion and data-driven results. The research contributes to criminal justice decisions in that it provides the interpretation of data sets or statistics and allows policymakers to have an insight into how their initiatives...
There is a gap in interpreting findings in academic research and practitioner policy development since policymakers may have difficulty interpreting research results. Research materials may be written in a hard-to-read language that may be difficult to understand. Sometimes practitioners face a lack of support from leadership in their initiatives to...
In this case, the termination of the childcare worker is a violation of public policy. Since there are state regulations regarding the minimum ratio between staff and child, the employee refused to make staff cuts according to those regulations. In other words, her termination was unlawful from the viewpoint of...
This particular case exemplifies the breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing. There was no actual reason for the employer to harass the machine operator with major depressive disorder in any way since the employee took leaves in accordance with the law, namely the Family and...
This case is an example of a violation of public policy. The legal secretary to a country commissioner is terminated for exercising her statutory rights. Although her position is related to politics, it does not mean she loses her right to have her own political beliefs. Therefore, this termination was...
In this case, public policy was violated because the employer tried to conceal physical abuse among the students. The teacher, in his turn, refused to violate a criminal statute by not reporting the situation to family services. It will not be difficult for the ex-employee to show the court that...
This scenario implies a violation of public policy, though there is the fault of both the employer and the employee. The employer was aware of specific criminal elements of his company and took no action. However, the employee who revealed those elements should have reported to the corresponding authorities after...
This case exemplifies a violation of public policy since the employer was violating a state statute. However, the reason for which the optician was terminated is not apparent. It appears that the former employee did not report the unlawful deeds of his supervisor to the corresponding authorities and only filed...
This case exemplifies the breach of the covenant of good faith and fair dealing. However, this case is unique because the discharged employee holds the fault ultimately. There was a direct statement regarding the arbitration of any disputes between the employee and the firm. Nonetheless, the newly hired legal secretary...
In this case, public policy was violated since the employee was asked to perform an unlawful task. Performing a specific medical procedure without the corresponding license violates the corresponding criminal statutes. As it is known, medical procedures performed by unlicensed clinicians may be dangerous for the patient’s health and lead...
Although the discharged employee claims that the employer’s request violated public policy, there was no actual violation. Suppose the organization’s rules prohibit using obscene vocabulary while in the workplace. The termination of the security manager is entirely justifiable and does not violate any laws or regulations. Even though the employer...
Considering the ethical approach to leadership, there are limited options on how police officers should react when they notice an unethical behavior of a colleague. From the deontological perspective, his duty is to report the violation despite possible friendly feelings or solidarity. Virtue ethics would propose speaking privately with another...
Analyze the Supreme Court case Kennedy v. Louisiana (2008). Kennedy was convicted and sentenced to death in Louisiana for the aggravated rape of his then-eight-year-old stepdaughter. A Louisiana state statute authorized capital punishment for the rape of a child under 12. The Supreme Court decided that the death penalty in...
Which two theories of financial crime suit best with the Steinhoff International case study? What are the elements of white-collar crime? What makes white-collar crime different from traditional crime? Explain with examples. Explain the need for a three-stream of research in the theoretical framework of financial crime. Justify with the...
Explain the criminal justice problem, and distrust in law enforcement, to internal stakeholders. Describe the contributing factor of the problem for which you are offering a solution to internal stakeholders. Explain the solution to the problem to internal stakeholders. Explain the potential impact of the solution on internal stakeholders.
Discuss the U.S. Supreme Court set guidelines for determining the admissibility of scientific and physical evidence into the courtroom. What later decision caused the U.S. Supreme Court to make assertions about the Frye standard, and what responsibility did that decision place on the trial judges? What were future forensic processes...
Is there a danger that early prevention will label or stigmatize kids as potential delinquents? Can you try to do good results in something that creates long-term harm? To answer this question, use and cite at least seven sources, of which at least three must be journaled articles. It is...
Describe a process of solving a problem or issue in public administration or administrative law. Describe the overall scientific or academic value your project will have and how such a project pertains to your future goals. Describe the background details relevant to your project. This could include a description of...
Provide a case analysis of an information technology law case, national arbitration forum domain name, using IRAC (Issue, Rule, Analysis, Conclusion). To answer this question, identify the important question (Issue), decide what law you need to decide that Issue (Rule), apply the Rule to your facts (Analysis), and reach a...
Discuss the account of St. Bartholomew’s Day Massacre. What was the Saint Bartholomew’s Day Massacre? Who was Gaspard de Coligny? How or why did his death spark a massacre? What does this story have to describe the nature of religious conflict and intolerance? What actions of Charles did I prompt...
Make the analytical approach and view of Mike Rose in Blue-Collar Brilliance. Discuss Mike Rose’s thoughts on the quirks of American working life in his essay Blue-Collar Brilliance. Mention the author’s observation of the restaurant’s operations. Analyze workplace practices and how exactly the mental and physical effort of a mother’s...
Discuss the rise in crime in the city of Atlanta and the United States. Analyze the increase in burglaries is likely due to prior restrictions in the COVID-19 pandemic, as they have imposed many financial hardships on the population. Evaluating the increase in various categories of crime in Atlanta may...
Discuss the tenure of former FBI Director James Brien Comey, Jr. Detail your methodology utilized to collect data and your interpretations of data. What are the scope and methodology? Discuss James Comey’s ethical violations. Analyze Christopher Steele Dossier and Fusion GPS controversies. Include valuing one’s personal ethical norms and standards...
Discuss reducing crime and disorder. Identify the problem-solving model for the evaluation of the issue or program. Explain how you would use the problem-solving model to evaluate criminal justice issues or programs. Describe the role of ethics guidelines and legislation as they relate to your selected problem-solving model and criminal...
Introduce what identity theft statutes are in the USA. How would you handle this crime if one of your clients was a victim? Or, you can write about being a victim if you, unfortunately, were one. Please make sure to note in the paper if you were a victim. Include...