Plaintiff Kargbo was a 52-year-old service coordinator for defendant Mendelsohn, a manager of social and health care services for senior citizens. The plaintiff completed five weeks of training before starting full-time. The plaintiff alleges that during this training, the defendant stated, “I don’t believe you are the right man for this job. You are 52 years old. This job is normally for young college graduates.” The plaintiff further alleges that the defendant’s employer treated the plaintiff poorly throughout the beginning of his employment. During the plaintiff’s three-month evaluation, the defendant listed the plaintiff’s performance as “unsatisfactory in the categories of effective communication and learning orientation.” The defendant later wrote an interoffice memorandum highlighting several complaints about the plaintiff’s work performance. Finally, the defendant submitted a form recommending that the plaintiff be terminated. The plaintiff brought claims under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act and the Age Employment Discrimination Act related to his termination of employment. The defendant moved for summary judgment on all claims. How do you think the court ruled? Why?

Need a paper written? Our academic experts can create an original essay on any subject for ~~$13.00~~ $11/page Learn More

There are laws and regulations that ensure that employers do not discriminate against workers on the basis of age, gender, race, religion, or ethnic origin. For example, there is the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967, which provides protection to workers 40 years of age and older from employment discrimination based on race.

The plaintiff had a five-week training and then started a three-month-long evaluation, after which his performance was considered unsatisfactory, with several complaints. However, during training, the plaintiff experienced verbal discrimination from a manager that claimed that the job was for young people and then treated the plaintiff poorly during the evaluation.

Title VII of the Civil Rights Act covers a broad specter of decisions made by the employer, including termination of employment. However, in order for the plaintiff to win the case, the fact of the termination due to age discrimination should be proven. One of the ways to do this can be seen in McDonnell Douglas v. Green.

According to the case, the plaintiff has to demonstrate the four elements of discrimination such as being protected by certain laws and regulations, meeting the performance expectations of the employer, suffering some employment action covered in the regulation act, and, if possible, proving that there was another worker who performed the same, but was in favor because he was not a member of the discriminated group.

Plaintiff is 52 years old. Hence, he is under the protection of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967. The manager was not satisfied with the plaintiff’s performance and filed several complaints. Therefore, the court is more likely to initiate the investigation. The aim of this investigation would be to find instances where workers who had similar complaints but were younger were not terminated. Otherwise, the plaintiff will not win the case.

Rate the answer:

Further research on topic

Answer by Academic.tip's expert

An answer to this question is provided by one of our experts who specializes in law. Let us know how much you liked it and give it a rating.

Cite this page

Select a citation style:

References

Academic.Tips. (2023) 'Plaintiff Kargbo was a 52-year-old service coordinator for defendant Mendelsohn, a manager of social and health care services for senior citizens. The plaintiff completed five weeks of training before starting full-time. The plaintiff alleges that during this training, the defendant stated, “I don’t believe you are the right man for this job. You are 52 years old. This job is normally for young college graduates.” The plaintiff further alleges that the defendant's employer treated the plaintiff poorly throughout the beginning of his employment. During the plaintiff’s three-month evaluation, the defendant listed the plaintiff’s performance as “unsatisfactory in the categories of effective communication and learning orientation.” The defendant later wrote an interoffice memorandum highlighting several complaints about the plaintiff’s work performance. Finally, the defendant submitted a form recommending that the plaintiff be terminated. The plaintiff brought claims under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act and the Age Employment Discrimination Act related to his termination of employment. The defendant moved for summary judgment on all claims. How do you think the court ruled? Why'. 12 March.

Reference

Academic.Tips. (2023, March 12). Plaintiff Kargbo was a 52-year-old service coordinator for defendant Mendelsohn, a manager of social and health care services for senior citizens. The plaintiff completed five weeks of training before starting full-time. The plaintiff alleges that during this training, the defendant stated, “I don’t believe you are the right man for this job. You are 52 years old. This job is normally for young college graduates.” The plaintiff further alleges that the defendant's employer treated the plaintiff poorly throughout the beginning of his employment. During the plaintiff’s three-month evaluation, the defendant listed the plaintiff’s performance as “unsatisfactory in the categories of effective communication and learning orientation.” The defendant later wrote an interoffice memorandum highlighting several complaints about the plaintiff’s work performance. Finally, the defendant submitted a form recommending that the plaintiff be terminated. The plaintiff brought claims under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act and the Age Employment Discrimination Act related to his termination of employment. The defendant moved for summary judgment on all claims. How do you think the court ruled? Why? https://academic.tips/question/plaintiff-kargbo-was-a-52-year-old-service-coordinator-for-defendant-mendelsohn-a-manager-of-social-and-health-care-services-for-senior-citizens-the-plaintiff-completed-five-weeks-of-training-before/

References

Academic.Tips. 2023. "Plaintiff Kargbo was a 52-year-old service coordinator for defendant Mendelsohn, a manager of social and health care services for senior citizens. The plaintiff completed five weeks of training before starting full-time. The plaintiff alleges that during this training, the defendant stated, “I don’t believe you are the right man for this job. You are 52 years old. This job is normally for young college graduates.” The plaintiff further alleges that the defendant's employer treated the plaintiff poorly throughout the beginning of his employment. During the plaintiff’s three-month evaluation, the defendant listed the plaintiff’s performance as “unsatisfactory in the categories of effective communication and learning orientation.” The defendant later wrote an interoffice memorandum highlighting several complaints about the plaintiff’s work performance. Finally, the defendant submitted a form recommending that the plaintiff be terminated. The plaintiff brought claims under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act and the Age Employment Discrimination Act related to his termination of employment. The defendant moved for summary judgment on all claims. How do you think the court ruled? Why?" March 12, 2023. https://academic.tips/question/plaintiff-kargbo-was-a-52-year-old-service-coordinator-for-defendant-mendelsohn-a-manager-of-social-and-health-care-services-for-senior-citizens-the-plaintiff-completed-five-weeks-of-training-before/.

1. Academic.Tips. "Plaintiff Kargbo was a 52-year-old service coordinator for defendant Mendelsohn, a manager of social and health care services for senior citizens. The plaintiff completed five weeks of training before starting full-time. The plaintiff alleges that during this training, the defendant stated, “I don’t believe you are the right man for this job. You are 52 years old. This job is normally for young college graduates.” The plaintiff further alleges that the defendant's employer treated the plaintiff poorly throughout the beginning of his employment. During the plaintiff’s three-month evaluation, the defendant listed the plaintiff’s performance as “unsatisfactory in the categories of effective communication and learning orientation.” The defendant later wrote an interoffice memorandum highlighting several complaints about the plaintiff’s work performance. Finally, the defendant submitted a form recommending that the plaintiff be terminated. The plaintiff brought claims under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act and the Age Employment Discrimination Act related to his termination of employment. The defendant moved for summary judgment on all claims. How do you think the court ruled? Why?" March 12, 2023. https://academic.tips/question/plaintiff-kargbo-was-a-52-year-old-service-coordinator-for-defendant-mendelsohn-a-manager-of-social-and-health-care-services-for-senior-citizens-the-plaintiff-completed-five-weeks-of-training-before/.

Bibliography

Academic.Tips. "Plaintiff Kargbo was a 52-year-old service coordinator for defendant Mendelsohn, a manager of social and health care services for senior citizens. The plaintiff completed five weeks of training before starting full-time. The plaintiff alleges that during this training, the defendant stated, “I don’t believe you are the right man for this job. You are 52 years old. This job is normally for young college graduates.” The plaintiff further alleges that the defendant's employer treated the plaintiff poorly throughout the beginning of his employment. During the plaintiff’s three-month evaluation, the defendant listed the plaintiff’s performance as “unsatisfactory in the categories of effective communication and learning orientation.” The defendant later wrote an interoffice memorandum highlighting several complaints about the plaintiff’s work performance. Finally, the defendant submitted a form recommending that the plaintiff be terminated. The plaintiff brought claims under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act and the Age Employment Discrimination Act related to his termination of employment. The defendant moved for summary judgment on all claims. How do you think the court ruled? Why?" March 12, 2023. https://academic.tips/question/plaintiff-kargbo-was-a-52-year-old-service-coordinator-for-defendant-mendelsohn-a-manager-of-social-and-health-care-services-for-senior-citizens-the-plaintiff-completed-five-weeks-of-training-before/.

Work Cited

"Plaintiff Kargbo was a 52-year-old service coordinator for defendant Mendelsohn, a manager of social and health care services for senior citizens. The plaintiff completed five weeks of training before starting full-time. The plaintiff alleges that during this training, the defendant stated, “I don’t believe you are the right man for this job. You are 52 years old. This job is normally for young college graduates.” The plaintiff further alleges that the defendant's employer treated the plaintiff poorly throughout the beginning of his employment. During the plaintiff’s three-month evaluation, the defendant listed the plaintiff’s performance as “unsatisfactory in the categories of effective communication and learning orientation.” The defendant later wrote an interoffice memorandum highlighting several complaints about the plaintiff’s work performance. Finally, the defendant submitted a form recommending that the plaintiff be terminated. The plaintiff brought claims under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act and the Age Employment Discrimination Act related to his termination of employment. The defendant moved for summary judgment on all claims. How do you think the court ruled? Why?" Academic.Tips, 12 Mar. 2023, academic.tips/question/plaintiff-kargbo-was-a-52-year-old-service-coordinator-for-defendant-mendelsohn-a-manager-of-social-and-health-care-services-for-senior-citizens-the-plaintiff-completed-five-weeks-of-training-before/.

Copy