Categories
Home/Law/What are the limitations of federal whistleblower protection for nonprofit organizations? What might be appropriate in an organization’s whistleblower policy?

What are the limitations of federal whistleblower protection for nonprofit organizations? What might be appropriate in an organization’s whistleblower policy?

Federal whistleblower policy implies protection from retaliation of staff who brings credible information on illegal practices. However, despite the benefits the policy provides, it has two considerable limitations that might prevent an employee from sharing the details.

The first is reduced employment prospects because of the attention to a whistleblower and the organization. The second is complications, such as the necessity to hire an attorney and exposure to threats from former co-workers. It might be appropriate to encourage staff to come up with information and act against any misconduct such as demotion, dismissal, and hours reduction.

Rate the answer:
Views: 9
Further research on topic
Answer by Academic.tip's expert
An answer to this question is provided by one of our experts who specializes in law. Let us know how much you liked it and give it a rating.

Cite this page

Select a citation style:

References

Academic.Tips. (2023) 'What are the limitations of federal whistleblower protection for nonprofit organizations? What might be appropriate in an organization’s whistleblower policy'. 12 March.

Reference

Academic.Tips. (2023, March 12). What are the limitations of federal whistleblower protection for nonprofit organizations? What might be appropriate in an organization’s whistleblower policy? https://academic.tips/question/what-are-the-limitations-of-federal-whistleblower-protection-for-nonprofit-organizations-what-might-be-appropriate-in-an-organizations-whistleblower-policy/

References

Academic.Tips. 2023. "What are the limitations of federal whistleblower protection for nonprofit organizations? What might be appropriate in an organization’s whistleblower policy?" March 12, 2023. https://academic.tips/question/what-are-the-limitations-of-federal-whistleblower-protection-for-nonprofit-organizations-what-might-be-appropriate-in-an-organizations-whistleblower-policy/.

1. Academic.Tips. "What are the limitations of federal whistleblower protection for nonprofit organizations? What might be appropriate in an organization’s whistleblower policy?" March 12, 2023. https://academic.tips/question/what-are-the-limitations-of-federal-whistleblower-protection-for-nonprofit-organizations-what-might-be-appropriate-in-an-organizations-whistleblower-policy/.


Bibliography


Academic.Tips. "What are the limitations of federal whistleblower protection for nonprofit organizations? What might be appropriate in an organization’s whistleblower policy?" March 12, 2023. https://academic.tips/question/what-are-the-limitations-of-federal-whistleblower-protection-for-nonprofit-organizations-what-might-be-appropriate-in-an-organizations-whistleblower-policy/.

Work Cited

"What are the limitations of federal whistleblower protection for nonprofit organizations? What might be appropriate in an organization’s whistleblower policy?" Academic.Tips, 12 Mar. 2023, academic.tips/question/what-are-the-limitations-of-federal-whistleblower-protection-for-nonprofit-organizations-what-might-be-appropriate-in-an-organizations-whistleblower-policy/.

Copy
How should research be used in criminal justice decisions and criminal justice policy development?
Plaintiff Kargbo was a 52-year-old service coordinator for defendant Mendelsohn, a manager of social and health care services for senior citizens. The plaintiff completed five weeks of training before starting full-time. The plaintiff alleges that during this training, the defendant stated, “I don’t believe you are the right man for this job. You are 52 years old. This job is normally for young college graduates.” The plaintiff further alleges that the defendant's employer treated the plaintiff poorly throughout the beginning of his employment. During the plaintiff’s three-month evaluation, the defendant listed the plaintiff’s performance as “unsatisfactory in the categories of effective communication and learning orientation.” The defendant later wrote an interoffice memorandum highlighting several complaints about the plaintiff’s work performance. Finally, the defendant submitted a form recommending that the plaintiff be terminated. The plaintiff brought claims under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act and the Age Employment Discrimination Act related to his termination of employment. The defendant moved for summary judgment on all claims. How do you think the court ruled? Why?
Check the price of your paper