Categories
Home/Law/Oprah Winfrey was sued for, in pertinent part, intentional infliction of emotional distress after making statements about Lerato Nomvuyo Mzamane’s performance as headmistress of the Oprah Winfrey Leadership Academy for Girls (OWLAG). OWLAG is a private academy in South Africa that provides education for children from impoverished families. After learning that one of the individuals working at the school had been abusive toward the students, Winfrey made statements to the effect that she had “lost confidence in [Mzamane’s] ability to run the school,” that Mzamane had failed to take student complaints “seriously,” that the abusers thought they were “protected by [Mzamane],” and other similar statements. Winfrey moved for summary judgment. How do you think the court ruled? Does it matter whether this is a jurisdiction that requires a physical injury to succeed on a claim for intentional infliction of emotional distress? Are there any other claims that the plaintiff could or may have pursued in this case?

Oprah Winfrey was sued for, in pertinent part, intentional infliction of emotional distress after making statements about Lerato Nomvuyo Mzamane’s performance as headmistress of the Oprah Winfrey Leadership Academy for Girls (OWLAG). OWLAG is a private academy in South Africa that provides education for children from impoverished families. After learning that one of the individuals working at the school had been abusive toward the students, Winfrey made statements to the effect that she had “lost confidence in [Mzamane’s] ability to run the school,” that Mzamane had failed to take student complaints “seriously,” that the abusers thought they were “protected by [Mzamane],” and other similar statements. Winfrey moved for summary judgment. How do you think the court ruled? Does it matter whether this is a jurisdiction that requires a physical injury to succeed on a claim for intentional infliction of emotional distress? Are there any other claims that the plaintiff could or may have pursued in this case?

The lawsuit against Oprah Winfrey is an example of a lack of sufficient evidence and elements to cause action. The plaintiff wanted to sue Winfrey for the intentional infliction of emotional distress after making statements about her disappointment in the headmaster’s performance.

The educational institution for impoverished girls has Oprah Winfrey’s name because it was her idea and project. It reflected Winfrey’s traumatizing experience; hence, it is understandable that her reaction to the physical or sexual abuse that happened in her educational facility caused such a reaction. Her intention was to improve the situation and initiate any change for the abuse to stop.

On the contrary, the plaintiff does not meet all the requirements for the intentional infliction of emotional distress lawsuit to win. There are four elements to it:

  • the defendant must act intentionally or recklessly;
  • the defendant’s conduct must be extreme and outrageous;
  • the conduct must be the cause of severe emotional distress.

While the first element is met, Oprah’s statements cannot be classified as extreme and outrageous as they address the issue directly related to the plaintiff’s performance. Causation and qualification of emotional distress are also hard to define. Hence, the court will accept Winfrey’s move to summary judgment.

There is no need for the physical injury to claim for intentional infliction of emotional distress, as physical manifestation is not always present in cases of distress. The severity is proven by a mental health professional. Plaintiff could claim false accusation, which would need an investigation on the matter.

Rate the answer:
Views: 7
Further research on topic
Answer by Academic.tip's expert
An answer to this question is provided by one of our experts who specializes in law. Let us know how much you liked it and give it a rating.

Cite this page

Select a citation style:

References

Academic.Tips. (2023) 'Oprah Winfrey was sued for, in pertinent part, intentional infliction of emotional distress after making statements about Lerato Nomvuyo Mzamane’s performance as headmistress of the Oprah Winfrey Leadership Academy for Girls (OWLAG). OWLAG is a private academy in South Africa that provides education for children from impoverished families. After learning that one of the individuals working at the school had been abusive toward the students, Winfrey made statements to the effect that she had “lost confidence in [Mzamane’s] ability to run the school,” that Mzamane had failed to take student complaints “seriously,” that the abusers thought they were “protected by [Mzamane],” and other similar statements. Winfrey moved for summary judgment. How do you think the court ruled? Does it matter whether this is a jurisdiction that requires a physical injury to succeed on a claim for intentional infliction of emotional distress? Are there any other claims that the plaintiff could or may have pursued in this case'. 12 March.

Reference

Academic.Tips. (2023, March 12). Oprah Winfrey was sued for, in pertinent part, intentional infliction of emotional distress after making statements about Lerato Nomvuyo Mzamane’s performance as headmistress of the Oprah Winfrey Leadership Academy for Girls (OWLAG). OWLAG is a private academy in South Africa that provides education for children from impoverished families. After learning that one of the individuals working at the school had been abusive toward the students, Winfrey made statements to the effect that she had “lost confidence in [Mzamane’s] ability to run the school,” that Mzamane had failed to take student complaints “seriously,” that the abusers thought they were “protected by [Mzamane],” and other similar statements. Winfrey moved for summary judgment. How do you think the court ruled? Does it matter whether this is a jurisdiction that requires a physical injury to succeed on a claim for intentional infliction of emotional distress? Are there any other claims that the plaintiff could or may have pursued in this case? https://academic.tips/question/oprah-winfrey-was-sued-for-in-pertinent-part-intentional-infliction-of-emotional-distress-after-making-statements-about-lerato-nomvuyo-mzamanes-performance-as-headmistress-of-the-oprah-winf/

References

Academic.Tips. 2023. "Oprah Winfrey was sued for, in pertinent part, intentional infliction of emotional distress after making statements about Lerato Nomvuyo Mzamane’s performance as headmistress of the Oprah Winfrey Leadership Academy for Girls (OWLAG). OWLAG is a private academy in South Africa that provides education for children from impoverished families. After learning that one of the individuals working at the school had been abusive toward the students, Winfrey made statements to the effect that she had “lost confidence in [Mzamane’s] ability to run the school,” that Mzamane had failed to take student complaints “seriously,” that the abusers thought they were “protected by [Mzamane],” and other similar statements. Winfrey moved for summary judgment. How do you think the court ruled? Does it matter whether this is a jurisdiction that requires a physical injury to succeed on a claim for intentional infliction of emotional distress? Are there any other claims that the plaintiff could or may have pursued in this case?" March 12, 2023. https://academic.tips/question/oprah-winfrey-was-sued-for-in-pertinent-part-intentional-infliction-of-emotional-distress-after-making-statements-about-lerato-nomvuyo-mzamanes-performance-as-headmistress-of-the-oprah-winf/.

1. Academic.Tips. "Oprah Winfrey was sued for, in pertinent part, intentional infliction of emotional distress after making statements about Lerato Nomvuyo Mzamane’s performance as headmistress of the Oprah Winfrey Leadership Academy for Girls (OWLAG). OWLAG is a private academy in South Africa that provides education for children from impoverished families. After learning that one of the individuals working at the school had been abusive toward the students, Winfrey made statements to the effect that she had “lost confidence in [Mzamane’s] ability to run the school,” that Mzamane had failed to take student complaints “seriously,” that the abusers thought they were “protected by [Mzamane],” and other similar statements. Winfrey moved for summary judgment. How do you think the court ruled? Does it matter whether this is a jurisdiction that requires a physical injury to succeed on a claim for intentional infliction of emotional distress? Are there any other claims that the plaintiff could or may have pursued in this case?" March 12, 2023. https://academic.tips/question/oprah-winfrey-was-sued-for-in-pertinent-part-intentional-infliction-of-emotional-distress-after-making-statements-about-lerato-nomvuyo-mzamanes-performance-as-headmistress-of-the-oprah-winf/.


Bibliography


Academic.Tips. "Oprah Winfrey was sued for, in pertinent part, intentional infliction of emotional distress after making statements about Lerato Nomvuyo Mzamane’s performance as headmistress of the Oprah Winfrey Leadership Academy for Girls (OWLAG). OWLAG is a private academy in South Africa that provides education for children from impoverished families. After learning that one of the individuals working at the school had been abusive toward the students, Winfrey made statements to the effect that she had “lost confidence in [Mzamane’s] ability to run the school,” that Mzamane had failed to take student complaints “seriously,” that the abusers thought they were “protected by [Mzamane],” and other similar statements. Winfrey moved for summary judgment. How do you think the court ruled? Does it matter whether this is a jurisdiction that requires a physical injury to succeed on a claim for intentional infliction of emotional distress? Are there any other claims that the plaintiff could or may have pursued in this case?" March 12, 2023. https://academic.tips/question/oprah-winfrey-was-sued-for-in-pertinent-part-intentional-infliction-of-emotional-distress-after-making-statements-about-lerato-nomvuyo-mzamanes-performance-as-headmistress-of-the-oprah-winf/.

Work Cited

"Oprah Winfrey was sued for, in pertinent part, intentional infliction of emotional distress after making statements about Lerato Nomvuyo Mzamane’s performance as headmistress of the Oprah Winfrey Leadership Academy for Girls (OWLAG). OWLAG is a private academy in South Africa that provides education for children from impoverished families. After learning that one of the individuals working at the school had been abusive toward the students, Winfrey made statements to the effect that she had “lost confidence in [Mzamane’s] ability to run the school,” that Mzamane had failed to take student complaints “seriously,” that the abusers thought they were “protected by [Mzamane],” and other similar statements. Winfrey moved for summary judgment. How do you think the court ruled? Does it matter whether this is a jurisdiction that requires a physical injury to succeed on a claim for intentional infliction of emotional distress? Are there any other claims that the plaintiff could or may have pursued in this case?" Academic.Tips, 12 Mar. 2023, academic.tips/question/oprah-winfrey-was-sued-for-in-pertinent-part-intentional-infliction-of-emotional-distress-after-making-statements-about-lerato-nomvuyo-mzamanes-performance-as-headmistress-of-the-oprah-winf/.

Copy
In 2006, a 21-year-old girl named Christina Eilman was arrested at Midway Airport for causing a disturbance. Although she was mentally ill, a police officer took her from the airport and dropped her off in a neighborhood well known for being unsafe. Her family later pointed out that she was dressed in a way that attracted attention. She was unaware of where she was and mentally unable to appreciate the dangers surrounding her. Furthermore, she was a young white girl, and her family argued that the officer dropped her off in a predominantly black, poverty-stricken neighborhood where she stood out and could foreseeably be the victim of a crime. After being dropped off, Christina was sexually assaulted by a gang member and thrown out of a seven-story window. Her parents subsequently filed a lawsuit against the city and police officer for being negligent. How do you think the court decided?
Explain the general types of deceptive advertising with which the FTC is most concerned.
Check the price of your paper