Stuck with your philosophy assignment?

Get answers from academic experts to any study-related questions.

Discuss the general belief system of the “philosophies”.

Belief systems significantly influence a state’s political and social development, especially in Asian countries. The Chinese, for instance, believed in cosmic unity and the divinity of the emperor who held the mandate of heaven. It led to the increased control and power of the ruler. In general, the earliest belief...

Why do human beings not reproduce but procreate?

Reproduction occurs as a result of fertilization, which is a natural and mindless process in mammals that allows them to continue to exist. The unity between humans is way more complex and involves different layers. The co-existence of the physical and the spiritual, as well as the intent and the...

How to Write a Teaching Philosophy Statement

Discuss how to write the teaching philosophy statement. The teaching philosophy is written in a narrative format and is replete with concrete examples which breathe life into the author’s values. While there is no specific format, the writing must contain the following elements: Introduction – a brief statement about who you...

How to Write a Research Paper on Political Theory

How would you write a research paper on some topic related to political theory? Begin with a broad topic and narrow it down to a specific research question you would like to answer. Pick a certain aspect of a theorist’s writings and apply it to a modern issue. Below are...

What Is Reality and What Is Not?

Penny Phang states, “When you were born into this life, you probably learned that what you see in front of you is “reality.” Do you agree with this statement? To answer the question, think of the next controversies. What is reality and what is not? Is one person’s reality the...

Defend a Position For/Against Descartes’ Cosmological Argument for the Existence of God

Analyze Descartes’ cosmological argument regarding God’s existence. Evaluate the method of inquiry used by Descartes in his Meditations. Which conclusions does he end up defending by following this method? Defend a position interpreting one of his views: is he successful? Defend a position for/against Descartes’ Cosmological argument for the existence...

Kant on Aesthetic Ideas, Rational Ideas, and the Subject-Matter of Art

Analyze Kant’s Third Critique: the Critique of the Power of Judgment. How does Kant view the aesthetics of poetry? Is poetry beautiful for Kant? What kinds of poetry? What are the forms/contents of poetry based on Kantian theory? How do we appreciate poetry’s beauty without its content (the conceptual meaning...

The Concept of Genius According to Kant

Discuss the question: What is genius for Kant? How can one genius teach another genius – without turning him or her into an imitator? (See Critique of the Power of Judgment by Kant). Do you think Kant is right to locate the source of art in (what he calls) genius?...

Origin and Nature of Descartes’ First Principle of Philosophy

Discuss the origin and nature of Descartes’ first principle of philosophy. Explain the origin and nature of Descartes’ first principle of philosophy, “I think; therefore I am.” By origin, it meant how he arrived at the principle. Compare and contrast this principle to the characterization of thinking. Identify the logical...

Understanding of Plato’s Allegory of the Cave

Discuss Plato’s “Allegory of the Cave”. The opposition between philosophical life and daily life (bios) is perhaps nowhere more powerfully figured than in the “Allegory of the Cave” from Plato’s “Republic”. Demonstrate your understanding by applying the terms and concepts from the lesson and readings to your analysis of the...

Benefits of Philosophical or Academic Argumentation

In Cohen’s view, what is the true benefit of philosophical or academic argumentation? Watch Cohen’s video “For argument’s sake”. Explain how we can go beyond argument as war, proof, or performance in academic discourse, or any discourse, in a spirit of collaboration rather than contention. How can we overcome the...

Political Components in Wallace’s and Orwell’s Works

Use either David Foster Wallace or George Orwell to analyze the political components of one of the analytic philosophy texts. First, explain the relevant features of Wallace/Orwell that matter for your analysis (for a general audience). Next, give a brief overview of the point and motivation of the analytic philosophy...

Do you agree that being able to forget a little bit is important for life? Or do you think we should be able to remember everything? Could we survive if we could remember everything?

According to Nietzsche, forgetting is essential to living well. I agree with this statement because dwelling on troubles, living with grievances, and relying on irritation and anger brings negativity into life, which can destroy an individual, society, and the state. Indeed, having memorized everything, we would not have survived since...

Read Nietzsche’s “On the advantage and disadvantage of history for life.” What does Nietzsche say with regard to animals’ and humans’ sense of time? Why don’t animals have ‘history’? What do you think it means that humans aspire to live in the present but can’t?

Nietzsche asserts that animals and humans feel differently about time. Animals are not worried about the past and the future; they live only in the present. That is why they have no history because history connects with the past. In turn, people have a history associated with the past, and...

Try to articulate the difference between “existence” and “essence” in Sartre’s thesis: “existence precedes essence.” What is “existence,” and what is “essence”? What do you think is the meaning of this thesis? Alternatively, what difficulties are you encountering in understanding it?

Jean-Paul Sartre explains the fine line between “existence” and “essence” and presents that existence usually precedes essence. While “essence” relates to the meaning of humanness and being wise to the surrounding, the term “existence” stands for the idea that it is real only when it is perceived by the human...

How can we distinguish between dreams and wake for Descartes? Can we distinguish at all? Can we distinguish between dreamed-up things and reality?

In a dream, it seems to people that they have perceptions corresponding to wakefulness. Thus, there are no clear criteria that would make it possible to distinguish dream perceptions from actual perceptions. Descartes’ argument about dreams is the possibility of doubt about the principles of mathematics, logic, and other exact...

What is the meaning of the building metaphor for Descartes, and what is “first philosophy”?

Descartes’s building metaphor is associated with the foundation of knowledge. Just as building construction involves laying a solid foundation and gradually building walls, so does the development of knowledge. According to Descartes, the “first philosophy” is metaphysics. Thus, metaphysics is a solid foundation of knowledge on which principles and theories...

On the second page of Meditation I, enumerate the steps of the progression of Descartes’ doubt. I started giving you an example with the first step: doubt in the senses; the second step, I am not insane. You should continue in this progression: What are the next steps?

The third step is to doubt that everything around is a dream and not reality. The fourth step concerns doubting divine principles. However, since God is good, the fifth step implies the existence of a cunning, deceitful, and powerful “evil genius” who tries to deceive.

Why is “I think therefore I am” the only point of certainty?

The principle ‘I think therefore I am’ makes consciousness more reliable than matter and one’s thinking (for oneself) more reliable than other people’s thinking. Although there is a tendency towards subjectivity in this position, Descartes came to a firm truth: the existence of the ‘I’ was proved by inference from...

Reconstruct to the best of your ability the Divided Line. Present the strongest argument you can in support of this theory of reality. Is the Divided Line theory consistent with modern science? Why or why not?

The Divided Line theory is a symbolic explanation of reality and the distinction between its two powers, namely the intellectual and visible worlds. Using this theory, Plato emphasizes the difference between knowledge and opinion. To explain the Divided Line theory, one should draw an imagined line and divide it into...

What is the purpose of the Allegory of the Cave? Why might a story be more instructive than a lecture? Have you ever learned more from a story than from a direct argument? When? And how?

The Allegory of the Cave is a story used by Plato to exemplify and vividly demonstrate an abstract notion that the philosopher aimed to explain. The purpose of this story is to indicate that the lack of education is a limiting factor that alters one’s belief about the world. Without...

What does Aristotle say about the definition of Eudaimonia and Happiness?

Concerning Aristotle, it is fair to say that Eudaimonia is the highest happiness a man can comprehend during his lifetime. The attainment of Eudaimonia becomes possible only through the endless choices of life, which can be complex; in so doing, benefits, whether economic, social, or spiritual, are achieved. Eudaimonia is...

How does Spinoza handle the matter of free will?

There is no free will, Spinoza thinks. One must come to terms with their limitations and the way the world is and reach a kind of freedom by learning to love God and nature. Freedom also manifests itself in a person’s ability to free themselves from the tyranny of passions,...

How does Descartes build up from the foundation of indubitable beliefs?

Descartes’ main problem was to justify his views on the external world using his rather narrow base about indubitable beliefs founded on the content of one’s mind. This is where the famous “Cogito Ergo Sum” – or “I think, therefore I exist” comes from. Descartes states that his certain knowledge...

Explain Spinoza’s Monism.

Whereas Descartes sets out to find epistemological foundations for knowledge, Spinoza seeks metaphysical connections. According to his perspective, the world is comprehensible, and nature can be seen as a rational thing. In exploring this assumption, one finds out that there is only one view that does not produce contradictions or...

How does Spinoza handle the mind & body problem?

Following in the footsteps of his God/nature theory, Spinoza explains that a human being’s existence presents one with two attributes – of thought and of extension – in other words, mind, and body, which actually are one and the same. The concept of them being different and interacting with one...

What beliefs does Descartes ultimately identify as indubitable?

There is at least one belief that Descartes finds indubitable. That is the belief that one thinks. Even if an allowance for an evil being is made, one still would have to be thinking of something to deceive them. An example of this would be forming a belief about the...

List and explain the six criteria for just war from the reading Philosophers Agree on Criteria for Justifiable War. Assess any one of America’s past or present wars according to those criteria.

Just Cause The just war tradition holds that aggression is unjustifiable and unjustly carried out in retaliation for aggression. Aggression is defined as the use or threat of force by one state against another’s political sovereignty or territorial integrity, such as America’s involvement in the Vietnam War. The apparent justification...

In his discussion of Marx & Engels, Marshall Berman states that under capitalism, “catastrophes are transformed into lucrative opportunities for redevelopment and renewal.” Find an example of the process described in this quote that relates to the COVID-19 crisis. Explain, drawing from Berman, whether the ultimate consequences of this ‘redevelopment and renewal’ are good or bad for society.

The occurrence of crises in the capitalistic world is viewed as an opportunity for change and further progress. Indeed, capitalism implies that monetary value might be asserted in any situation, which is why catastrophes should be viewed as sources of developmental inspiration. Indeed, the latest events associated with the outbreak...

When deontologists describe their theory as a priori, what precisely do they mean?

A priori refers to knowledge that comes before any experience or independently from it, which is a concept started by Immanuel Kant. Kant distinguished between a priori and a posteriori (derived from experience) knowledge by pointing out the differences between necessary and contingent truth. The former refers to a truth...

What influences or impacts personality development?

The first perspective is a psychodynamic personality development theory. This theory was pioneered by Sigmund Freud, who assumed that personality is based on the three structural elements – id, ego, and superego. Those three elements coexist within a person, and the relationships between them and reality shape the personality. The...

For Aristotle what makes human beings moral and virtuous is the use of reasons and the restraint it provides against instincts and passions. What does Rousseau claim makes men moral?

According to Rousseau, morality is an intrinsic quality of every human being vital for living in communal societies. Moral men have a sense of moral duty and possess different categories of judgment. Besides, righteous men only include the ideals of self-preservation which allows them to address the most basic needs...

Define and describe Virtue Ethics. What do you think of the theory? Explain.

Virtue ethics is concerned with individuals’ characters acting, unlike the ethical responsibilities or consequences of specific actions. They are mainly based on Aristotle’s definition of virtuous individuals as people who possess ideal characters. The characters stem from internal inmate behaviors and must be developed to be stable. In the context...

In Book 9 Aristotle establishes two notions of Self-Love, one good and one bad. The positive version of Self-Love has to do with those with good character and the negative version has to do with people of bad character. Explain, compare and contrast these two versions of Self-Love.

Self-love is when people put themselves priority when doing something or when making a decision. Depending on the situation, it can either be lousy self-love or good. Good self-love is when people choose to do just, moderate, or do as the rules command. Positive self-love also ensures that one secures...

What does Aristotle say about imperfect friendships? Should we try to remain in the relationship or “dissolve” it? Why or why not?

Aristotle thinks that a friendship between virtuous people and bad people is imperfect because each individual sees the other as a source of advantage for themselves. Imperfection also comes in because the company is based on the reasonable person’s character or the wrong person’s behavior because those different characters cannot...

Describe the controversy over Skinner’s views of human behavior, and identify some ways to apply operant conditioning principles at school, at work, and at home.

Skinner’s theory was based on the view that human behavior is dependent on the quality of consequences that follow. The controversy of the psychologist’s theory is related to Skinner’s simplistic approach to understanding the roots and causes of such a complex process as forming of behavior. Although the theorist acknowledged...

Define and describe philosophy.

Philosophy refers to the quest for knowledge, knowledge, and truth in its expansive sagacity. Nevertheless, in Greek, the term itself implies “love of understanding.” Individuals contemplate philosophy whenever they cogitate on profound, central issues about reality and themselves, the precincts of human understanding, their ideals, and the drive of life....

Are you philosophical? Explain.

I consider myself philosophical, following my ability to stay thoughtful and detached in case of any setback that is threatening my efforts to lead quality and sustainable lifestyles. The research of how humans think through difficulties is more precisely the field of philosophy in modern days. Ancient thinkers have various...

Does Socrates agree with Euthyphro’s definitions: why yes or why no?

Socrates does not agree with the definitions of piety and impiety given by Euthyphro. He does this by leading questions that lead the hero’s reasoning to a dead end. The solution of the problem that follows from Socrates’ reasoning differs from the definitions of Euthyphro. So, he claims that gods...

What is your understanding of reality and how did you come to that conclusion?

Reality constitutes all there is, known and unknown, both as a unified system and a combination of separate parts. It cannot be truly perceived in its entirety, since the inability to fully comprehend all of the existence is a part of the concept itself. The philosophical studies of mind and...

Why do people act differently in each of their social groups? How have social groups, formal organizations, and society as a whole changed with time? Why is it Important to use or employ Verstehen when learning about the events that have occurred in the past year in America?

These are questions that Max Weber, one of the founding fathers of sociology would ask. He thought of sociology as a science of social action. Weber believed that understanding why people do the things they do is the basic building-block of sociology, a concept he termed Verstehen. He believed that...

Of the five classical branches of philosophy, i.e., Metaphysics, Epistemology, Ethics, Logic, and Aesthetics, which branch do you find most interesting? Explain why.

For me, of the five classical branches of philosophy, ethics is the most interesting. It studies moral issues, including capital punishment, euthanasia, and abortion, and tries to find universal answers to the question of the morality of these concepts. However, it is evident that there is no definite answer because...

What did Marx believe would eventually happen to the world?

Marx thought that, in the end, the working class would rebel against the bourgeoisie, and the workers’ revolution would end the bourgeoisie’s existence. As a result, there would be only one social class, and all citizens would be equal. In this new world, no oppression would take place, and even...

Consider cases in which someone has a heart transplant from an organ donor, and begins to experience feelings and emotions associated with that donor’s former life. What would two of the philosophers say about this phenomenon?

With regard to memories experienced after receiving an organ for a donor, Hume would argue that the self exists as a result of recorded sensory impressions. Therefore, sensory objects play a critical role in forming the self, which becomes embedded in the body. Descartes would argue that the act of...

Explain Locke’s distinction between sensations and reflections, and Hume’s distinction between impressions and ideas. How are their theories alike, and how do they differ? Whose view is most convincing? Be sure to explain each philosopher’s key terms in your answer.

Hume believed that impressions are vivid perceptions of the mind’s expressions while ideas are reflections of impressions. Locke noted that sensations are the experiences gained from sensory stimulation, while reflections are thought processes in one’s mind. While both theories define the origin of ideas, Locke includes aspects of the senses...

You and a friend are kidnapped by an evil mad doctor who is planning to switch your brain into your friend’s body and your friend’s brain into your body. After the surgery, you will not remember the surgery. You will be treated as the body you currently inhabit with that body’s identification, driver’s license, etc. Who would you say you are, according to Locke? Why would Descartes possibly disagree?

According to Locke, consciousness is inextricably linked to personal identity rather than the physical form. Therefore, people are not dependent on their bodies, and they can exist in other bodies. Descartes would disagree because while he believed that the self is separate from the body, he did not state that...

Some argue that Descartes really does not need to use “radical doubt” to help us perceive our mind as a perceiving thing. Describe Descartes’ method of doubt, and explain his examples of why doubt is necessary. Do you agree or disagree with his method?

The method of doubt encourages individuals to doubt the truth regarding everything and realize that indubitable ideas qualify as pieces of knowledge. I believe it is an effective way of understanding truths because doubt prompts inquiry which is essential for a comprehensive review of an idea’s multifaceted elements.

Consider the example of maring ice in a freezer. How do we know that the water we placed in the freezer is the same thing as the ice we take out later? What would Descartes and Locke tell us about how we know the “thing” that is the water and the ice?

Descartes posits that the marked ice in a freezer can only be identified by depending on absolute certainty. Therefore, the individual must be capable of deducing that the ice is the result of frozen water. Locke proposes that there is no certainty in knowledge. Therefore, the identity of the ice...

When Russell talks about things like “prejudice” and “common sense,” what does he mean? Based on his use of these terms, what role does he think philosophy should play in addressing “prejudice” or “common sense”? How might this compare to the role that Socrates thinks philosophy should play in a society? Use specific passages from The Apology and the Russell reading on “The Value of Philosophy” in your response.

Russell’s view on common sense and prejudice is that the aforementioned notions are often conceived in the absence of concrete evidence. In order to avoid falling victim to prejudice, he proposes that topics must be evaluated from all sides using philosophical principles in order to gain a better perspective. Socrates...

What did the Oracle at Delphi mean when he told Socrates “You are the wisest of men”? How does Socrates’ understanding of wisdom compare with how Russell describes philosophy and having a sense of wonder?

The Oracle of Delphi meant that Socrates was filled with wisdom because he had embraced his inability to know everything. Both Russell and Socrates prefer to question ideas rather than assess issues superficially. Sophists were regarded as individuals who were skilled at arguing in support of any side of an...

Socrates wanted to be known as a “philo-sophoi” and not a “sophist.” Explain the difference between these two terms, and give an example of how Socrates addresses ethical issues in a way that shows his love of the truth. Was he unjustly accused? Was he a gadfly in a good way, or merely a nuisance to the people of Athens?

Socrates’ insistence on being referred to as “philo-sophoi” was based on his insistence on arguing for the truth. He was unjustly accused, seeing as he supported the dissemination of truth. He addressed ethical issues by questioning what others considered the truth and by analyzing concepts such as piety and virtue....

How does Rousseau distinguish “the general will” from “the will of all”? Why does this distinction matter in understanding Rousseau’s normative account of law?

Political philosophy is one of the primary subjects in the works of Jean-Jacques Rousseau, and the terms “the general will” and “the will of all” should also be interpreted in the legislative context. The philosopher regards that the primary purpose of the government should be aligned with the general will....

Discuss how representational realism can still lead us to the external world.

The primary qualities of an object do not depend on the existence or opinions of an observer. For example, the Grand Canyon existed long before humanity and, though it has changed over time, as all things do, has generally maintained its shape. Each of its sections has a specific depth...

What is the philosophical method? Have you used it? How?

The philosophical method, or philosophical methodology, is a study of how philosophy is done, and a way in which philosophers tend to address philosophical questions. There is more than one way used by philosophers to answer those questions. The main elements of philosophical methods include asking questions that involve methodic...

Socrates said to his jurors, “Are you not ashamed that, while you take care to acquire as much wealth as possible, with honor and glory as well, yet you take no care or thought for understanding truth, or for the best possible state of your soul?” Do you agree with this attitude? Why or why not?

The attitude addressed by Socrates in the given statement may seem too radical and subjective to some people nowadays. Although being obsessed with money and constantly wishing to gain more is still seen as a vice, the fact of having large amounts of money does not make someone a bad...

Explain Kant’s objection to homosexuality. How might it be argued that homosexual relations are compatible with, rather than contrary to, Kant’s view of the legitimate use of our sexual faculties?

According to Kant the inclination of a person towards another merely serves the purpose of fulfilling our sexual desires rather than following our human nature. In his opinion safe guarding the moralistic ground of our nature and keeping ourselves from debasement requires us to enter into a binding contract of...

Perry asserts that the Greeks were the first to consistently apply reason to the study of the physical world and all human activities. Discuss how Greek philosophy, art, literature, and historical thought exemplify the Greek movement toward a rational analysis of the world and the human condition. Use examples from the primary source readings on Homer, Plato and Aristotle, Thucydides’ Melian Dialogue, Sophocles’ Antigone.

In the history of mankind, the Greeks were the first people to apply reason in the study of the physical world and human beings through their art architecture, philosophy, historical thought so they become the first ever to think rationally. The Greek architecture consisted of buildings that were found in...

Explain how both Spinoza and Leibniz would attempt to avoid the mind-body problem. Explain whether you think Spinoza or Leibniz are successful in resolving the problem and why.

Spinoza and Leibniz do not believe in clear distinctions between the brain and the mind. Spinoza utilizes a monist approach to the issue and states that, despite the seeming differences, both the body and the mind are the manifestations of the universal energy – God. Leibniz offers his own version...

Examine Kantian Ethics, or Deontology. Focus on rule-based ethics, where unlike Utilitarianism, the intent of the agent plays an important role.

Contributing to the happiness of others seems to rely on the fact that people doing so ignore their own wants. However, these individuals use themselves as both an end in themselves and a means to others’ ones, satisfying the deontological formulation of humanity. Furthermore, if run through the appropriate questions,...

How do you explain the problem of evil in the world?

It should be renowned that the idea of natural evil may be discarded if one considers that proceedings such as tremor and food shortage have come concerning due to personal misconduct of the surroundings. It is also dubious whether a tremor causing the loss of a person’s existence is an...

How does Kuhn’s philosophy differ from Popper’s philosophy?

Karl Popper and Thomas Kuhn were the most dominant philosophers of science in the twentieth century. Piggott shows that both Popper and Kuhn are often referenced in academic works, and their viewpoints remain valuable to researchers. Whereas Sir Karl Popper was studied logic and the scientific method, Kuhn worked in...

This is Plato’s famous divided line. The highest form of Reality is immaterial noesis, the lowest form of reality is an image of an object, or eikasia. What reason does Plato give to claim the noesis is superior to eikasia?

Plato’s famous divided line defines the concept of separation of the human soul into four processes from the lowest to the highest section, respectively. In his dialectic, Plato expressed the idea that these sections on a line represent the path the human soul follows to come to enlightenment. On the...

Why Is It Possible to Know Anything at All?

The question regarding the possibility of knowing anything with complete certainty remains open according to the existing theological studies (Plantinga, 2015). Nevertheless, the Bible posits that it is possible to carry the knowledge of a particular notion, phenomenon, or object (Plantinga, 2015). The specified ability is justified by the statements...

a. What is Prime Reality? b. What is the nature of the world around you? c. What is a Human Being? d. What Happens to a Person at Death? e. Why is it Possible to Know Anything at all? f. How do People Know What is Right or Wrong? g. What is the Meaning of Human History?

a. Various views on the world have different explanations for what prime reality is. In religion, particularly in Christianity, the prime reality is God. However, naturalism considers that the term relates to eternal matter. In addition, in this belief, God does not exist at all. Postmodernism defines prime reality in...

Why is it important for Kant to divest moral philosophy of any empirical and anthropological foundations? What precisely does it mean for Kant to claim that the moral worth of action comes from acting in accord with duty (provide some of your own examples)? Why is this the case, and how does it help him to establish a “pure” moral philosophy? How does one determine one’s duty, i.e., what is the categorical imperative? How does the categorical imperative allow Kant to overcome empirical and anthropological underpinnings and to establish a pure moral philosophy?

Kant’s understanding of the moral worth of an action is rather specific. He is sure that an action is valued morally only in case it is done under the pressure of duty. Otherwise, people do actions for their personal desires and needs. Those who say that they have to get...

Sade has a three-prong attack on the notion of virtue in which he discusses the existence of God, the cultural origins of virtue, and the relation of virtues to Nature. Elaborate on each of these points and how they are used to support Sade’s position that one should not act according to virtue. Not content merely to undermine the existence of virtue, Sade goes to great lengths to demonstrate that murder is far from criminal. How exactly does Sade defend this position by appealing to Nature? No fool, Sade claims that “deceit” is the most assured means to success, i.e., wealth and pleasure. What evidence does Sade offer in support of his position? Lastly, in an attempt to pre-empt our criticisms of his position, Sade claims that the “Golden Rule” is uttered only from the mouths of the weak and that Nature urges us to think of nothing but ourselves. Why is it the case that Sade is not afraid of falling prey to the unleashed forces of the philosophy he advocates?

Sade says that God does not interfere in the actions of human beings, and he does not meddle in human affairs as we are here, on the planet, only because there is no other way out. Dwelling upon God, the author states that being in the place where they must...

What is the importance of Aristotle’s discussion of experts in Book III, Ch. 11?

Aristotle’s discussion of experts has several important implications. First of all, he suggests that no separate individual has sufficient knowledge and expertise in order to govern the state alone. The thing is that people in their collective capacity can better negotiate laws and restrict the power of the ruler. Thus,...