The London Court of Arbitration has granted an arbitral award to Gee Co. The award requires H.R.R, the state-owned railway company in State H, to pay damages to Gee Co., a company headquartered and incorporated in State G, for breach of contract for the carriage of goods. Gee Co. seeks to enforce the award in a British court. H.R.R pleads that it is immune. What will the Court decide?

Need a paper written? Our academic experts can create an original essay on any subject for ~~$13.00~~ $11/page Learn More

Under Article 34 of the Commercial arbitration law (UNICTRAL), which is binding on the parties, only the alternatives available to the country in terms of setting aside the said application would be available if a formal application is made for setting aside as per the following:

There is valid proof that the other contracting party is incapable or incapacitated for entering into a valid contract.

The applicant of the arbitration proceedings did not give proper notice or was unable to present his case in the correct light.

The award deals with a dispute not considered or not falling within the terms of the submission to adjudication or contains decisions on matters beyond the scope of the submission to arbitration, provided that, if the matters regarding arbitration can be separated from non-arbitration, it may be deemed to set aside the non-arbitration aspects.

The making of the tribunal or its procedure is not in conformity with the agreement between the parties unless such agreement was not violative of the provision of any law, and such act is not lawfully acclaimed by the parties.

Or if the Court finds that the subject matter of the arbitration cannot be solved through this procedure in this state or, it is against the public policy of the state to resort to arbitration in this case.

In this case, it is seen that a body of arbitration has directed H.R.R to pay damages to Gee Co for alleged breach of contract in the carriage of goods. The competent court would be the court that is mentioned in the clauses of the covenant between H.R.R and GEE Co.

Rate the answer:

Answer by Academic.tip's expert

An answer to this question is provided by one of our experts who specializes in law. Let us know how much you liked it and give it a rating.

Cite this page

Select a citation style:

References

Academic.Tips. (2021) 'The London Court of Arbitration has granted an arbitral award to Gee Co. The award requires H.R.R, the state-owned railway company in State H, to pay damages to Gee Co., a company headquartered and incorporated in State G, for breach of contract for the carriage of goods. Gee Co. seeks to enforce the award in a British court. H.R.R pleads that it is immune. What will the Court decide'. 9 October.

Reference

Academic.Tips. (2021, October 9). The London Court of Arbitration has granted an arbitral award to Gee Co. The award requires H.R.R, the state-owned railway company in State H, to pay damages to Gee Co., a company headquartered and incorporated in State G, for breach of contract for the carriage of goods. Gee Co. seeks to enforce the award in a British court. H.R.R pleads that it is immune. What will the Court decide? https://academic.tips/question/the-london-court-of-arbitration-has-granted-an-arbitral-award-to-gee-co-the-award-requires-h-r-r-the-state-owned-railway-company-in-state-h-to-pay-damages-to-gee-co-a-company-headquartered-and-in/

References

Academic.Tips. 2021. "The London Court of Arbitration has granted an arbitral award to Gee Co. The award requires H.R.R, the state-owned railway company in State H, to pay damages to Gee Co., a company headquartered and incorporated in State G, for breach of contract for the carriage of goods. Gee Co. seeks to enforce the award in a British court. H.R.R pleads that it is immune. What will the Court decide?" October 9, 2021. https://academic.tips/question/the-london-court-of-arbitration-has-granted-an-arbitral-award-to-gee-co-the-award-requires-h-r-r-the-state-owned-railway-company-in-state-h-to-pay-damages-to-gee-co-a-company-headquartered-and-in/.

1. Academic.Tips. "The London Court of Arbitration has granted an arbitral award to Gee Co. The award requires H.R.R, the state-owned railway company in State H, to pay damages to Gee Co., a company headquartered and incorporated in State G, for breach of contract for the carriage of goods. Gee Co. seeks to enforce the award in a British court. H.R.R pleads that it is immune. What will the Court decide?" October 9, 2021. https://academic.tips/question/the-london-court-of-arbitration-has-granted-an-arbitral-award-to-gee-co-the-award-requires-h-r-r-the-state-owned-railway-company-in-state-h-to-pay-damages-to-gee-co-a-company-headquartered-and-in/.

Bibliography

Academic.Tips. "The London Court of Arbitration has granted an arbitral award to Gee Co. The award requires H.R.R, the state-owned railway company in State H, to pay damages to Gee Co., a company headquartered and incorporated in State G, for breach of contract for the carriage of goods. Gee Co. seeks to enforce the award in a British court. H.R.R pleads that it is immune. What will the Court decide?" October 9, 2021. https://academic.tips/question/the-london-court-of-arbitration-has-granted-an-arbitral-award-to-gee-co-the-award-requires-h-r-r-the-state-owned-railway-company-in-state-h-to-pay-damages-to-gee-co-a-company-headquartered-and-in/.

Work Cited

"The London Court of Arbitration has granted an arbitral award to Gee Co. The award requires H.R.R, the state-owned railway company in State H, to pay damages to Gee Co., a company headquartered and incorporated in State G, for breach of contract for the carriage of goods. Gee Co. seeks to enforce the award in a British court. H.R.R pleads that it is immune. What will the Court decide?" Academic.Tips, 9 Oct. 2021, academic.tips/question/the-london-court-of-arbitration-has-granted-an-arbitral-award-to-gee-co-the-award-requires-h-r-r-the-state-owned-railway-company-in-state-h-to-pay-damages-to-gee-co-a-company-headquartered-and-in/.

Copy