Categories
Home/Law/State A dumps its raw, unprocessed sewage into the sea, thereby killing much of marine life along its coastline and coastlines of its neighbors, States B and C. The three States each have recognized the jurisdiction of the International Court of Justice (ICJ) to resolve disputes between them involving breaches of international law. States B and C, accordingly, have brought suit in the ICJ against State A. They have asked the Court to order State A to take immediate steps to stop dumping sewage into the ocean and to pay for their expenses in cleaning up their coastlines. What should the Court do? Defend your answer.

State A dumps its raw, unprocessed sewage into the sea, thereby killing much of marine life along its coastline and coastlines of its neighbors, States B and C. The three States each have recognized the jurisdiction of the International Court of Justice (ICJ) to resolve disputes between them involving breaches of international law. States B and C, accordingly, have brought suit in the ICJ against State A. They have asked the Court to order State A to take immediate steps to stop dumping sewage into the ocean and to pay for their expenses in cleaning up their coastlines. What should the Court do? Defend your answer.

Under Article 210 Subsection 4 of United Nations Convention for Law of Sea (UNCLOS), pollution by dumping by States, acting especially through competent international organizations or diplomatic conferences, shall endeavor to establish global and regional rules, standards, and recommended practices and procedures to prevent, reduce and control such pollution. Such rules, standards, and recommended practices and procedures shall be re-examined from time to time as necessary.

Again under Subsection 5 of UNCLOS, dumping within the territorial sea and the exclusive economic zone or onto the continental shelf shall not be carried out without the express prior approval of the coastal state, which has the right to permit, regulate and control such dumping after due consideration of the matter with other States which by reason of their geographical situation may be adversely affected thereby.

Again, under the London Convention, the dumping of sewerage is actively discouraged and banned since it could be a major source of hazard for marine life and could render permanent damage to the marine environment.

The International Court of Justice (ICJ) should serve to restrain notice to Country A under the London Convention 1972 and other relevant sea protection laws. Further, it needs to be seen that Country A is inviting cause for penalty and compensatory damages by violating international ocean safety laws.

In this case, it is seen that the provisions of Annex IV of MARPOL (73-78) are also invoked. Under it, “The discharge of sewage into the sea will be prohibited, except when the ship has in operation an approved sewage treatment plant or is discharging comminuted and disinfected sewage using an approved system at a distance of more than three nautical miles from the nearest land; or is discharging sewage which is not comminuted or disinfected at a distance of more than 12 nautical miles from the nearest land.”

Rate the answer:
Views: 64
Answer by Academic.tip's expert
An answer to this question is provided by one of our experts who specializes in law. Let us know how much you liked it and give it a rating.

Cite this page

Select a citation style:

References

Academic.Tips. (2021) 'State A dumps its raw, unprocessed sewage into the sea, thereby killing much of marine life along its coastline and coastlines of its neighbors, States B and C. The three States each have recognized the jurisdiction of the International Court of Justice (ICJ) to resolve disputes between them involving breaches of international law. States B and C, accordingly, have brought suit in the ICJ against State A. They have asked the Court to order State A to take immediate steps to stop dumping sewage into the ocean and to pay for their expenses in cleaning up their coastlines. What should the Court do? Defend your answer'. 8 October.

Reference

Academic.Tips. (2021, October 8). State A dumps its raw, unprocessed sewage into the sea, thereby killing much of marine life along its coastline and coastlines of its neighbors, States B and C. The three States each have recognized the jurisdiction of the International Court of Justice (ICJ) to resolve disputes between them involving breaches of international law. States B and C, accordingly, have brought suit in the ICJ against State A. They have asked the Court to order State A to take immediate steps to stop dumping sewage into the ocean and to pay for their expenses in cleaning up their coastlines. What should the Court do? Defend your answer. https://academic.tips/question/state-a-dumps-its-raw-unprocessed-sewage-into-the-sea-thereby-killing-much-of-marine-life-along-its-coastline-and-coastlines-of-its-neighbors-states-b-and-c-the-three-states-each-have-recognized-t/

References

Academic.Tips. 2021. "State A dumps its raw, unprocessed sewage into the sea, thereby killing much of marine life along its coastline and coastlines of its neighbors, States B and C. The three States each have recognized the jurisdiction of the International Court of Justice (ICJ) to resolve disputes between them involving breaches of international law. States B and C, accordingly, have brought suit in the ICJ against State A. They have asked the Court to order State A to take immediate steps to stop dumping sewage into the ocean and to pay for their expenses in cleaning up their coastlines. What should the Court do? Defend your answer." October 8, 2021. https://academic.tips/question/state-a-dumps-its-raw-unprocessed-sewage-into-the-sea-thereby-killing-much-of-marine-life-along-its-coastline-and-coastlines-of-its-neighbors-states-b-and-c-the-three-states-each-have-recognized-t/.

1. Academic.Tips. "State A dumps its raw, unprocessed sewage into the sea, thereby killing much of marine life along its coastline and coastlines of its neighbors, States B and C. The three States each have recognized the jurisdiction of the International Court of Justice (ICJ) to resolve disputes between them involving breaches of international law. States B and C, accordingly, have brought suit in the ICJ against State A. They have asked the Court to order State A to take immediate steps to stop dumping sewage into the ocean and to pay for their expenses in cleaning up their coastlines. What should the Court do? Defend your answer." October 8, 2021. https://academic.tips/question/state-a-dumps-its-raw-unprocessed-sewage-into-the-sea-thereby-killing-much-of-marine-life-along-its-coastline-and-coastlines-of-its-neighbors-states-b-and-c-the-three-states-each-have-recognized-t/.


Bibliography


Academic.Tips. "State A dumps its raw, unprocessed sewage into the sea, thereby killing much of marine life along its coastline and coastlines of its neighbors, States B and C. The three States each have recognized the jurisdiction of the International Court of Justice (ICJ) to resolve disputes between them involving breaches of international law. States B and C, accordingly, have brought suit in the ICJ against State A. They have asked the Court to order State A to take immediate steps to stop dumping sewage into the ocean and to pay for their expenses in cleaning up their coastlines. What should the Court do? Defend your answer." October 8, 2021. https://academic.tips/question/state-a-dumps-its-raw-unprocessed-sewage-into-the-sea-thereby-killing-much-of-marine-life-along-its-coastline-and-coastlines-of-its-neighbors-states-b-and-c-the-three-states-each-have-recognized-t/.

Work Cited

"State A dumps its raw, unprocessed sewage into the sea, thereby killing much of marine life along its coastline and coastlines of its neighbors, States B and C. The three States each have recognized the jurisdiction of the International Court of Justice (ICJ) to resolve disputes between them involving breaches of international law. States B and C, accordingly, have brought suit in the ICJ against State A. They have asked the Court to order State A to take immediate steps to stop dumping sewage into the ocean and to pay for their expenses in cleaning up their coastlines. What should the Court do? Defend your answer." Academic.Tips, 8 Oct. 2021, academic.tips/question/state-a-dumps-its-raw-unprocessed-sewage-into-the-sea-thereby-killing-much-of-marine-life-along-its-coastline-and-coastlines-of-its-neighbors-states-b-and-c-the-three-states-each-have-recognized-t/.

Copy
Chung Properties is building a new hotel in Wan Chai. The construction site has a fence but it was broken and the firm’s site supervisor did not post any warning sign. On a weekend, Emily, aged 15, and her friends got through the broken fence and played in the construction site. Emily accidentally tripped and fell from the scaffolding. She sustained severe multiple injuries. Emily’s parents hire a lawyer and sue Chung Properties. a. Did Chung Properties have an absolute liability in Emily’s injury? Explain. b. Based on the elements of a negligent act, discuss what Emily’s lawyer must establish in order to win the case of negligence against Chung Properties. c. Do you believe that Emily has a case?
State X licensed Glowing Power Co. to operate several nuclear power plants within its territory. Despite all due care, an accident occurred at one of these plants, and a large cloud of radioactive dust escaped into the atmosphere. The cloud floated into the airspace above State Y before it began settling. It then caused extensive damage to the population and the natural environment of State Y. Is State X liable? Is the Glowing Power Co. liable? Defend your reasoning.
Check the price of your paper