Categories
Home/Law/On appeal, the U.S. Court of Appeal for the Third Circuit in Kimberlie D. Webb v. City of Philadelphia (2009) upheld the ruling by Judge Bartle. If Webb were not a sworn police officer and worked in an administrative position in the police department, do you think there would be a problem accommodating her wearing of the khimar? Support your opinion.

On appeal, the U.S. Court of Appeal for the Third Circuit in Kimberlie D. Webb v. City of Philadelphia (2009) upheld the ruling by Judge Bartle. If Webb were not a sworn police officer and worked in an administrative position in the police department, do you think there would be a problem accommodating her wearing of the khimar? Support your opinion.

I think there would be no problem if Webb wore the khimar to work because the administrative department of policing does not require uniformity in dressing. Also, the khimar represents Webb’s identity religiously and personally. Therefore, it is essential to accommodate her wearing for inclusivity of all religions and their practices at work. According to, non-uniform staff in the policing sector have permission to dress according to an individual’s lifestyle and culture as long as the dressing conforms to the official standards of workplace policy in maintaining professionalism.

For example, if Webb worked in the administrative department, there could be no conditions or limits to wearing the hijab to maintain her culture and identity as a Muslim. According to Article VII of the American Civil rights act, all employees have a right to practice religious traditions, including dressing in religious attire such as hijabs at work. Therefore, the administrative department should act like any other employment sector in allowing religious attire among the staff.

Rate the answer:
Views: 18
Answer by Academic.tip's expert
An answer to this question is provided by one of our experts who specializes in law. Let us know how much you liked it and give it a rating.

Cite this page

Select a citation style:

References

Academic.Tips. (2022) 'On appeal, the U.S. Court of Appeal for the Third Circuit in Kimberlie D. Webb v. City of Philadelphia (2009) upheld the ruling by Judge Bartle. If Webb were not a sworn police officer and worked in an administrative position in the police department, do you think there would be a problem accommodating her wearing of the khimar? Support your opinion'. 9 October.

Reference

Academic.Tips. (2022, October 9). On appeal, the U.S. Court of Appeal for the Third Circuit in Kimberlie D. Webb v. City of Philadelphia (2009) upheld the ruling by Judge Bartle. If Webb were not a sworn police officer and worked in an administrative position in the police department, do you think there would be a problem accommodating her wearing of the khimar? Support your opinion. https://academic.tips/question/on-appeal-the-u-s-court-of-appeal-for-the-third-circuit-in-kimberlie-d-webb-v-city-of-philadelphia-2009-upheld-the-ruling-by-judge-bartle-if-webb-were-not-a-sworn-police-officer-and-worked-in-a/

References

Academic.Tips. 2022. "On appeal, the U.S. Court of Appeal for the Third Circuit in Kimberlie D. Webb v. City of Philadelphia (2009) upheld the ruling by Judge Bartle. If Webb were not a sworn police officer and worked in an administrative position in the police department, do you think there would be a problem accommodating her wearing of the khimar? Support your opinion." October 9, 2022. https://academic.tips/question/on-appeal-the-u-s-court-of-appeal-for-the-third-circuit-in-kimberlie-d-webb-v-city-of-philadelphia-2009-upheld-the-ruling-by-judge-bartle-if-webb-were-not-a-sworn-police-officer-and-worked-in-a/.

1. Academic.Tips. "On appeal, the U.S. Court of Appeal for the Third Circuit in Kimberlie D. Webb v. City of Philadelphia (2009) upheld the ruling by Judge Bartle. If Webb were not a sworn police officer and worked in an administrative position in the police department, do you think there would be a problem accommodating her wearing of the khimar? Support your opinion." October 9, 2022. https://academic.tips/question/on-appeal-the-u-s-court-of-appeal-for-the-third-circuit-in-kimberlie-d-webb-v-city-of-philadelphia-2009-upheld-the-ruling-by-judge-bartle-if-webb-were-not-a-sworn-police-officer-and-worked-in-a/.


Bibliography


Academic.Tips. "On appeal, the U.S. Court of Appeal for the Third Circuit in Kimberlie D. Webb v. City of Philadelphia (2009) upheld the ruling by Judge Bartle. If Webb were not a sworn police officer and worked in an administrative position in the police department, do you think there would be a problem accommodating her wearing of the khimar? Support your opinion." October 9, 2022. https://academic.tips/question/on-appeal-the-u-s-court-of-appeal-for-the-third-circuit-in-kimberlie-d-webb-v-city-of-philadelphia-2009-upheld-the-ruling-by-judge-bartle-if-webb-were-not-a-sworn-police-officer-and-worked-in-a/.

Work Cited

"On appeal, the U.S. Court of Appeal for the Third Circuit in Kimberlie D. Webb v. City of Philadelphia (2009) upheld the ruling by Judge Bartle. If Webb were not a sworn police officer and worked in an administrative position in the police department, do you think there would be a problem accommodating her wearing of the khimar? Support your opinion." Academic.Tips, 9 Oct. 2022, academic.tips/question/on-appeal-the-u-s-court-of-appeal-for-the-third-circuit-in-kimberlie-d-webb-v-city-of-philadelphia-2009-upheld-the-ruling-by-judge-bartle-if-webb-were-not-a-sworn-police-officer-and-worked-in-a/.

Copy
On appeal, the U.S. Court of Appeal for the Third Circuit in Kimberlie D. Webb v. City of Philadelphia (2009) upheld the ruling by Judge Bartle. Explain the city’s and the judge’s position. Agree or disagree? Justify.
You are a claims handler for an insurer. One of the insurer's policyholders XYZ Ltd, is a wholesale firework distributor. XYZ Ltd has a public liability insurance policy with an excess of £5,000. XYZ Ltd have stored all its fireworks in the same industrial premises for over 20 years. Recently a small residential housing estate has been built close by the industrial premises. Richard who owns a property on the housing estate that is closest to the industrial premises, has made a complaint to XYZ Ltd. The complaint related to the noise, dust and traffic caused by its company motor vehicles. Residents of the housing estate have also complained to XYZ Ltd about its vehicles regularly blocking access to their homes. A sub-contractor carried out maintenance work on the roof of the industrial premises. During the maintenance work a fire broke out, resulting in a number of explosions. These explosions caused extensive damage to several properties on the housing estate. XYZ Ltd made a claim. Explain, with justification, one defence available to XYZ Ltd in respect of one of the torts XYZ Ltd may have committed. Refer to one statute in support of your explanation.
Check the price of your paper