Describe ways this public health intervention could be evaluated and discuss the outcome of any evaluation of the intervention.

Significant evidence backs the perspective that cigarette smoking is primarily facilitated by the addiction to nicotine in tobacco. This creates dependence through activation of the mesolimbic dopaminergic reward scheme, and physiologic withdrawal indications manifest the moment nicotine administration stops. Being a principal element of neural nicotinic acetylcholine receptors (NAChRs), nicotine is found presynaptically and postsynaptically in the nervous system. Underlying receptors regulate the freeing of neurotransmitters. With the increased exposure of an individual to nicotine, NAChRs also rise and cause the ensuing nicotine tolerance. Therefore, aspects that result in reduced bioavailability of nicotine are believed to augment a person’s craving and lessen the chances of quitting since a large number of NRT products are required to realise a given rate of dopamine. Drawing from such evaluations has resulted in the creation of smoking cessation treatment programmes that underscore nicotine replacement.

The effective evaluation focuses on evidence pertaining to the function of nicotine pills, alone or together with other approaches for successful smoking cessation over and above a critical assessment of the effects of such medications on changes in the habit within the population. This has resulted in the discourse of nicotine replacement therapy (NRT) in a comprehensive population-anchored programme created to decrease the harmful effects of tobacco. Several medical tests have evaluated the success of nicotine medications in assisting people in quitting smoking. Following the evaluation of commercially accessible types of NRT, Beard et al. affirm that the public health intervention enhances quit rate twofold irrespective of the health setting or application of adjunct treatment. Numerous studies have established that total abstinence from tobacco in the early course of quit attempts is an indicator of lasting cessation.

It has been established that increase in the sale of NRT from the moment they became available over-the-counter might be because of the rising use among smokers in groups that earlier had minimal utilisation of such products, for example, young smokers, people with minimal rates of daily cigarette smoking and want to stop, and perhaps individuals with low incomes. Present public health guidelines for the treatment of nicotine dependence suggest that NRT should be utilised by every smoker attempting to quit smoking. Researchers have evaluated the differential impact of NRT reliant on patient attributes and comorbid conditions such as depression and the abuse of other substances. Some of them have established that smokers who use more than one packet of cigarettes each day obtain many benefits from high doses of NRT products. Nonetheless, the rate of daily tobacco consumption has not been proved to be a constant influence modifier in the forecast of treatment effectiveness with the help of NRT. Other researchers have asserted that females who use NRT products experience lower smoking cessation success levels than their male counterparts. Generally, outcomes of evaluations focussing on patient aspects that connect with NRT to anticipate quit level have been equivocal. This is the reason behind the modern practice guidelines recommending NRT for every smoker who desires to quit.

Outcomes of evaluations of NRT use support the opinion that the combination of some form of in-person or phone facilitated behavioural counselling support with the public health intervention improves the possibility of smoking cessation, particularly for nicotine gum. Counselling support improves the efficacy of NRT interventions by assisting smokers in comprehending the way in which medications operate and the best approach of using them correctly. It also strengthens smokers’ motivation to quit and lead a tobacco-free life. Nevertheless, regardless of the advantage of using behavioural counselling alongside NRT, it has been possible for many smokers to quit smoking devoid of such support.

Among many smokers who do not use stop-smoking medication such as NRT products, the cost is often cited as the reason behind it. In the United Kingdom, the price of NRT products required to complete a full dose lies between £494 and £3,554. Over time, medical insurance companies are offering coverage for NRT. Nevertheless, many companies necessitate smokers to obtain a prescription from public health officers or attend stop-smoking lessons over and above restricting the number of times that a person can seek NRT interventions. These practices discourage many smokers from embarking on smoking cessation endeavours or choosing NRT. Although some evaluation practices affirm that the initial high price of acquiring NRT products over-the-counter assists in ensuring that only smokers who are highly motivated to quit start the process, mounting evidence shows that this hinders many from using the intervention to assist them to stop smoking.

Answer by Academic.tip's expert
An answer to this question is provided by one of our experts who specializes in health & medicine. Let us know how much you liked it and give it a rating.

Cite this page

Select a citation style:

References

Academic.Tips. (2022) 'Describe ways this public health intervention could be evaluated and discuss the outcome of any evaluation of the intervention'. 10 February.

Reference

Academic.Tips. (2022, February 10). Describe ways this public health intervention could be evaluated and discuss the outcome of any evaluation of the intervention. https://academic.tips/question/describe-ways-this-public-health-intervention-could-be-evaluated-and-discuss-the-outcome-of-any-evaluation-of-the-intervention/

References

Academic.Tips. 2022. "Describe ways this public health intervention could be evaluated and discuss the outcome of any evaluation of the intervention." February 10, 2022. https://academic.tips/question/describe-ways-this-public-health-intervention-could-be-evaluated-and-discuss-the-outcome-of-any-evaluation-of-the-intervention/.

1. Academic.Tips. "Describe ways this public health intervention could be evaluated and discuss the outcome of any evaluation of the intervention." February 10, 2022. https://academic.tips/question/describe-ways-this-public-health-intervention-could-be-evaluated-and-discuss-the-outcome-of-any-evaluation-of-the-intervention/.


Bibliography


Academic.Tips. "Describe ways this public health intervention could be evaluated and discuss the outcome of any evaluation of the intervention." February 10, 2022. https://academic.tips/question/describe-ways-this-public-health-intervention-could-be-evaluated-and-discuss-the-outcome-of-any-evaluation-of-the-intervention/.

Work Cited

"Describe ways this public health intervention could be evaluated and discuss the outcome of any evaluation of the intervention." Academic.Tips, 10 Feb. 2022, academic.tips/question/describe-ways-this-public-health-intervention-could-be-evaluated-and-discuss-the-outcome-of-any-evaluation-of-the-intervention/.

Copy