The Habitus as Orthe Doxa and The Evidence of Experience

Analyze the works “The habitus as orthe doxa” by Bourdieu and “The Evidence of Experience” by Scott.

Does Bourdieu use more accessible language and deal with the issue in question using conditional imagery? Does Scott write more formally, avoiding the use of informal speech and using professional narrative language? Do both texts share standard features, such as the consideration of similar topics or writing in the same format?