Categories
Home/Law/You happen to be in the courthouse during the trial of some of the members of the gun advocacy group. As you walk by the chambers of the judge who is presiding over the trial, you overhear the judge and the chief prosecutor discussing the case. The judge is talking about one of the defendants in the case and is making some very derogatory comments. You’ve often appeared in trials before this judge, and you’ve always found him to be fair and impartial. In this case, however, you’re concerned that the judge and prosecutor may be engaging in inappropriate activity. This situation is particularly troublesome because the trial is proceeding at the request of all parties as a bench trial, with the decision being rendered by the judge without the benefit of a jury. What would you do? Explain your answer.

You happen to be in the courthouse during the trial of some of the members of the gun advocacy group. As you walk by the chambers of the judge who is presiding over the trial, you overhear the judge and the chief prosecutor discussing the case. The judge is talking about one of the defendants in the case and is making some very derogatory comments. You’ve often appeared in trials before this judge, and you’ve always found him to be fair and impartial. In this case, however, you’re concerned that the judge and prosecutor may be engaging in inappropriate activity. This situation is particularly troublesome because the trial is proceeding at the request of all parties as a bench trial, with the decision being rendered by the judge without the benefit of a jury. What would you do? Explain your answer.

Normally, police officers ensure cooperation between all agencies of the legal system. Negligence of such a responsibility equals an obstruction of justice. Judiciary dispenses equity and enhances its cooperation with all agencies in upholding the rule of law. This is the reason why if I have a complaint about a judge on an ongoing case, the complaints are lodged after the occurrence’s determination.

I will wait for the ongoing case’s determination and then lodge my complaints with the court’s clerk’s office against the particular magistrate. I will register the grievances because of my obligation to cooperate with all legal agencies to pursue justice for all defendants and the jurist. On the other hand, confidentiality as a principle may not be upheld even if the sheriff delivers a fair trial because the Law Lord has talked about an exposition before a court of law. Whichever way the case is determined, the magistrate shall have committed a crime by giving an opinion about a defendant.

Lastly, I understand the judiciary as the interpreter of a constitution and, therefore, cannot be ignored in the criminal justice system. All complaints against any judge are always filed through the office of the clerk of the same court. Filing a complaint on any judge acting on an ongoing case is tantamount to obstructing justice. Undoubtedly, I will be performing against the ethics of upholding the law.

Rate the answer:
Views: 10
Answer by Academic.tip's expert
An answer to this question is provided by one of our experts who specializes in law. Let us know how much you liked it and give it a rating.

Cite this page

Select a citation style:

References

Academic.Tips. (2022) 'You happen to be in the courthouse during the trial of some of the members of the gun advocacy group. As you walk by the chambers of the judge who is presiding over the trial, you overhear the judge and the chief prosecutor discussing the case. The judge is talking about one of the defendants in the case and is making some very derogatory comments. You’ve often appeared in trials before this judge, and you’ve always found him to be fair and impartial. In this case, however, you’re concerned that the judge and prosecutor may be engaging in inappropriate activity. This situation is particularly troublesome because the trial is proceeding at the request of all parties as a bench trial, with the decision being rendered by the judge without the benefit of a jury. What would you do? Explain your answer'. 14 June.

Reference

Academic.Tips. (2022, June 14). You happen to be in the courthouse during the trial of some of the members of the gun advocacy group. As you walk by the chambers of the judge who is presiding over the trial, you overhear the judge and the chief prosecutor discussing the case. The judge is talking about one of the defendants in the case and is making some very derogatory comments. You’ve often appeared in trials before this judge, and you’ve always found him to be fair and impartial. In this case, however, you’re concerned that the judge and prosecutor may be engaging in inappropriate activity. This situation is particularly troublesome because the trial is proceeding at the request of all parties as a bench trial, with the decision being rendered by the judge without the benefit of a jury. What would you do? Explain your answer. https://academic.tips/question/you-happen-to-be-in-the-courthouse-during-the-trial-of-some-of-the-members-of-the-gun-advocacy-group-as-you-walk-by-the-chambers-of-the-judge-who-is-presiding-over-the-trial-you-overhear-the-judge-a/

References

Academic.Tips. 2022. "You happen to be in the courthouse during the trial of some of the members of the gun advocacy group. As you walk by the chambers of the judge who is presiding over the trial, you overhear the judge and the chief prosecutor discussing the case. The judge is talking about one of the defendants in the case and is making some very derogatory comments. You’ve often appeared in trials before this judge, and you’ve always found him to be fair and impartial. In this case, however, you’re concerned that the judge and prosecutor may be engaging in inappropriate activity. This situation is particularly troublesome because the trial is proceeding at the request of all parties as a bench trial, with the decision being rendered by the judge without the benefit of a jury. What would you do? Explain your answer." June 14, 2022. https://academic.tips/question/you-happen-to-be-in-the-courthouse-during-the-trial-of-some-of-the-members-of-the-gun-advocacy-group-as-you-walk-by-the-chambers-of-the-judge-who-is-presiding-over-the-trial-you-overhear-the-judge-a/.

1. Academic.Tips. "You happen to be in the courthouse during the trial of some of the members of the gun advocacy group. As you walk by the chambers of the judge who is presiding over the trial, you overhear the judge and the chief prosecutor discussing the case. The judge is talking about one of the defendants in the case and is making some very derogatory comments. You’ve often appeared in trials before this judge, and you’ve always found him to be fair and impartial. In this case, however, you’re concerned that the judge and prosecutor may be engaging in inappropriate activity. This situation is particularly troublesome because the trial is proceeding at the request of all parties as a bench trial, with the decision being rendered by the judge without the benefit of a jury. What would you do? Explain your answer." June 14, 2022. https://academic.tips/question/you-happen-to-be-in-the-courthouse-during-the-trial-of-some-of-the-members-of-the-gun-advocacy-group-as-you-walk-by-the-chambers-of-the-judge-who-is-presiding-over-the-trial-you-overhear-the-judge-a/.


Bibliography


Academic.Tips. "You happen to be in the courthouse during the trial of some of the members of the gun advocacy group. As you walk by the chambers of the judge who is presiding over the trial, you overhear the judge and the chief prosecutor discussing the case. The judge is talking about one of the defendants in the case and is making some very derogatory comments. You’ve often appeared in trials before this judge, and you’ve always found him to be fair and impartial. In this case, however, you’re concerned that the judge and prosecutor may be engaging in inappropriate activity. This situation is particularly troublesome because the trial is proceeding at the request of all parties as a bench trial, with the decision being rendered by the judge without the benefit of a jury. What would you do? Explain your answer." June 14, 2022. https://academic.tips/question/you-happen-to-be-in-the-courthouse-during-the-trial-of-some-of-the-members-of-the-gun-advocacy-group-as-you-walk-by-the-chambers-of-the-judge-who-is-presiding-over-the-trial-you-overhear-the-judge-a/.

Work Cited

"You happen to be in the courthouse during the trial of some of the members of the gun advocacy group. As you walk by the chambers of the judge who is presiding over the trial, you overhear the judge and the chief prosecutor discussing the case. The judge is talking about one of the defendants in the case and is making some very derogatory comments. You’ve often appeared in trials before this judge, and you’ve always found him to be fair and impartial. In this case, however, you’re concerned that the judge and prosecutor may be engaging in inappropriate activity. This situation is particularly troublesome because the trial is proceeding at the request of all parties as a bench trial, with the decision being rendered by the judge without the benefit of a jury. What would you do? Explain your answer." Academic.Tips, 14 June 2022, academic.tips/question/you-happen-to-be-in-the-courthouse-during-the-trial-of-some-of-the-members-of-the-gun-advocacy-group-as-you-walk-by-the-chambers-of-the-judge-who-is-presiding-over-the-trial-you-overhear-the-judge-a/.

Copy
In the course of your investigation of the gun advocacy group, you have to go to your local county prison to question one of the group members being held there pending trial. This particular individual has been a problem inmate and is being held in solitary confinement. He’s to have no contact with other members of the group. You meet with him alone in a private interrogation room. He knows that you generally support the group, and he does his best to answer your questions, although his answers aren’t as complete as you would like. At the end of the questioning – just before he rises to leave the room – he slips you a note in a sealed envelope and asks that you give it to someone who is involved in the gun advocacy group. He says it’s very important and implores you to just hand it to the person or drop it in the mail. He then leaves the interrogation room. What do you do? Explain your answer.
You’re asked to investigate the gun advocacy group and its activities. To do so, you need to work with the police department in the next county. After contacting their chief, you’re assigned to work with another seasoned officer who has also been conducting some preliminary investigations of the group. You decide to do some field investigations together the following day. While you’re out working on the investigation, the other officer decides to stop at the local convenient market for some lunch. He picks up a sandwich and coffee, waves to the owner, and returns to the police vehicle – without paying for the items. When you ask him about it, he says that he has an “arrangement” with the owner and not to worry about it. He explains that he and the store owner help each other out. Finally, he says, “If you’re hungry, go inside and pick up what you want.” What do you do and what concerns do you have? Explain your answers.
Check the price of your paper