Most books about rock ‘n’ roll history portray the Beatle’s oeuvre as a progressive advancement for popular music, yet at least one prominent historian takes a different view. Elijah Wald’s book “How The Beatles Destroyed Rock and Roll: An Alternative History of American Popular Music” different take on the impact of the Beatles. After reading Wald’s article, summarize his position. Do you agree with Wald that if the Beatles are “going to get credit for their triumphs, they should also bear at least some of the responsibility for what was lost?” Do you agree with Wald’s assessment of today’s pop audience? Why do you think that 40 years after the Beatles broke up, the American popular music scene has become “so segregated that 40 years of rock would include barely a half-dozen successful black players, or that 30 years of hip-hop could attract a huge interracial audience without producing more than two or three white stars?” Is this changing? Why or why not?

Wald is unapologetic about the negative contribution that the Beatles had on rock music and culture. The introduction of twist and hybrid fusion of rock and urban pop music has created confusion among the two major races in America. Unfortunately, the white music community has not benefited from this shift as their African American counterparts. In fact, pop culture has replaced rock culture.

I disagree with Wald since the Beatles opted for the fusion to expand the fan base for hybrid rock music. Besides, the music industry in the 1960s experienced a complete paradigm shift into an inclusive interracial genre. The Beatles had to play along to remain appealing across the musical divide.

The American popular music scene has become more segregated than was the case in the 1960s as the gap between the white and black music divide narrows. This is not changing at any time in the near future because the fuse between pop and rock has become inseparable.

Answer by Academic.tip's expert
An answer to this question is provided by one of our experts who specializes in art. Let us know how much you liked it and give it a rating.

Cite this page

Select a citation style:

References

Academic.Tips. (2022) 'Most books about rock ‘n’ roll history portray the Beatle’s oeuvre as a progressive advancement for popular music, yet at least one prominent historian takes a different view. Elijah Wald’s book “How The Beatles Destroyed Rock and Roll: An Alternative History of American Popular Music” different take on the impact of the Beatles. After reading Wald's article, summarize his position. Do you agree with Wald that if the Beatles are “going to get credit for their triumphs, they should also bear at least some of the responsibility for what was lost?” Do you agree with Wald's assessment of today's pop audience? Why do you think that 40 years after the Beatles broke up, the American popular music scene has become “so segregated that 40 years of rock would include barely a half-dozen successful black players, or that 30 years of hip-hop could attract a huge interracial audience without producing more than two or three white stars?” Is this changing? Why or why not'. 25 July.

Reference

Academic.Tips. (2022, July 25). Most books about rock ‘n’ roll history portray the Beatle’s oeuvre as a progressive advancement for popular music, yet at least one prominent historian takes a different view. Elijah Wald’s book “How The Beatles Destroyed Rock and Roll: An Alternative History of American Popular Music” different take on the impact of the Beatles. After reading Wald's article, summarize his position. Do you agree with Wald that if the Beatles are “going to get credit for their triumphs, they should also bear at least some of the responsibility for what was lost?” Do you agree with Wald's assessment of today's pop audience? Why do you think that 40 years after the Beatles broke up, the American popular music scene has become “so segregated that 40 years of rock would include barely a half-dozen successful black players, or that 30 years of hip-hop could attract a huge interracial audience without producing more than two or three white stars?” Is this changing? Why or why not? https://academic.tips/question/most-books-about-rock-n-roll-history-portray-the-beatles-oeuvre-as-a-progressive-advancement-for-popular-music-yet-at-least-one-prominent-historian-takes-a-different-view/

References

Academic.Tips. 2022. "Most books about rock ‘n’ roll history portray the Beatle’s oeuvre as a progressive advancement for popular music, yet at least one prominent historian takes a different view. Elijah Wald’s book “How The Beatles Destroyed Rock and Roll: An Alternative History of American Popular Music” different take on the impact of the Beatles. After reading Wald's article, summarize his position. Do you agree with Wald that if the Beatles are “going to get credit for their triumphs, they should also bear at least some of the responsibility for what was lost?” Do you agree with Wald's assessment of today's pop audience? Why do you think that 40 years after the Beatles broke up, the American popular music scene has become “so segregated that 40 years of rock would include barely a half-dozen successful black players, or that 30 years of hip-hop could attract a huge interracial audience without producing more than two or three white stars?” Is this changing? Why or why not?" July 25, 2022. https://academic.tips/question/most-books-about-rock-n-roll-history-portray-the-beatles-oeuvre-as-a-progressive-advancement-for-popular-music-yet-at-least-one-prominent-historian-takes-a-different-view/.

1. Academic.Tips. "Most books about rock ‘n’ roll history portray the Beatle’s oeuvre as a progressive advancement for popular music, yet at least one prominent historian takes a different view. Elijah Wald’s book “How The Beatles Destroyed Rock and Roll: An Alternative History of American Popular Music” different take on the impact of the Beatles. After reading Wald's article, summarize his position. Do you agree with Wald that if the Beatles are “going to get credit for their triumphs, they should also bear at least some of the responsibility for what was lost?” Do you agree with Wald's assessment of today's pop audience? Why do you think that 40 years after the Beatles broke up, the American popular music scene has become “so segregated that 40 years of rock would include barely a half-dozen successful black players, or that 30 years of hip-hop could attract a huge interracial audience without producing more than two or three white stars?” Is this changing? Why or why not?" July 25, 2022. https://academic.tips/question/most-books-about-rock-n-roll-history-portray-the-beatles-oeuvre-as-a-progressive-advancement-for-popular-music-yet-at-least-one-prominent-historian-takes-a-different-view/.


Bibliography


Academic.Tips. "Most books about rock ‘n’ roll history portray the Beatle’s oeuvre as a progressive advancement for popular music, yet at least one prominent historian takes a different view. Elijah Wald’s book “How The Beatles Destroyed Rock and Roll: An Alternative History of American Popular Music” different take on the impact of the Beatles. After reading Wald's article, summarize his position. Do you agree with Wald that if the Beatles are “going to get credit for their triumphs, they should also bear at least some of the responsibility for what was lost?” Do you agree with Wald's assessment of today's pop audience? Why do you think that 40 years after the Beatles broke up, the American popular music scene has become “so segregated that 40 years of rock would include barely a half-dozen successful black players, or that 30 years of hip-hop could attract a huge interracial audience without producing more than two or three white stars?” Is this changing? Why or why not?" July 25, 2022. https://academic.tips/question/most-books-about-rock-n-roll-history-portray-the-beatles-oeuvre-as-a-progressive-advancement-for-popular-music-yet-at-least-one-prominent-historian-takes-a-different-view/.

Work Cited

"Most books about rock ‘n’ roll history portray the Beatle’s oeuvre as a progressive advancement for popular music, yet at least one prominent historian takes a different view. Elijah Wald’s book “How The Beatles Destroyed Rock and Roll: An Alternative History of American Popular Music” different take on the impact of the Beatles. After reading Wald's article, summarize his position. Do you agree with Wald that if the Beatles are “going to get credit for their triumphs, they should also bear at least some of the responsibility for what was lost?” Do you agree with Wald's assessment of today's pop audience? Why do you think that 40 years after the Beatles broke up, the American popular music scene has become “so segregated that 40 years of rock would include barely a half-dozen successful black players, or that 30 years of hip-hop could attract a huge interracial audience without producing more than two or three white stars?” Is this changing? Why or why not?" Academic.Tips, 25 July 2022, academic.tips/question/most-books-about-rock-n-roll-history-portray-the-beatles-oeuvre-as-a-progressive-advancement-for-popular-music-yet-at-least-one-prominent-historian-takes-a-different-view/.

Copy