The first argument that proves the statement about the costly and ineffective care made in the documentary is the fact that the country spends trillions to treat the population, but little progress in preventable diseases is achieved. The US cannot be noted among those Western democracies that rank high in the prevention of obesity, heart concerns, diabetes, and other chronic conditions. Another argument is that the hospitals advertise to care providers instead of offering services directly to patients. This causes the situation when experienced doctors bring their insured patients and ensure profit for the organizations. In this case, it seems that patients are considered in the role of customers, whose purchasing power is the main indicator for their health improvement. As a result, these doctors receive not only pay for their services but also privileges from the clinics, which motivates them to assign costly procedures and drugs.
The third argument is the disconnection between the care providers and the corporations that want more profit. It would be naive to suggest that doctors should think only about patient care without paying attention to financial incentives. However, the documentary stresses a critical conflict and skewness towards profit. In other words, it becomes clear that this crisis in US healthcare is a national problem that involves a lot of stakeholders. These arguments seem to be substantial as the film presents evidence-based data and interviews with experts. In addition, the current medical infrastructure lacks proper coordination, which can be often observed during hospital visits when unnecessary services are offered at high prices, which only strengthens this for-profit enterprise. One can also understand the behaviors of doctors as they want appropriate payment for their work. It is clear that the problem has a set of components, each of which requires specific solutions.