Based on Nozick’s perception, justice implies that an individual who acquired something in a just way is morally acceptable to own it. He argues that in a free nation, different individuals hold various resources, therefore, leading to voluntary exchanges amongst the people. In his view, justice is when individuals are freely volunteering to undertake any action. Regarding entitlement, Nozick believes anyone who acquires property following the right processes is entitled to own it. Furthermore, when it comes to transferring holding, he argues that if an individual through justice in transfer acquires something from a person who is permitted to have it, then the person is entitled to win the product.
Concerning liberty, he suggests that the principled pattern can be easily tampered with when people act freely. When individuals have the freedom to transfer their resources, the distribution of justice may be interfered with since the element of entitlement may not be adhered to. By talking about Wilt Chamberlain, Nozick wanted to elaborate on how the principle of distribution can be easily achieved with minimum interference in individuals’ lives.