Edwards v. South Carolina is significant because it limited states’ ability to A) Protect protestors. B) Restrict the freedom of speech. C) Convict criminals. D) Restrict the freedom of the press.

A

B is the correct answer. Edwards v. South Carolina is significant because it limited states’ ability to restrict the freedom of speech.

Explanation:

The case was directly related to a breach of the United States’ first amendment that guarantees freedom of speech. In 1963, the protest of black students for their civil rights initiated the case. When the State of South Carolina arrested them for demanding an end to segregation, lynching, and other forms of discrimination, it created a precedent for the violation of the first amendment. The case defended the freedom of speech and assembly on a federal level.

The results of the court had the opposite effect on the protection of protestors, granting them increased rights. Additionally, the case was not in any way related to the conviction of criminals (Answer C) or freedom of the press, such as the New York Times (Answer D).

The 1963 Protests in South Carolina.
The 1963 Protests in South Carolina (Source: https://www.youtube.com)
Answer by Academic.tip's expert
An answer to this question is provided by one of our experts who specializes in law. Let us know how much you liked it and give it a rating.

Cite this page

Select a citation style:

References

Academic.Tips. (2020) 'Edwards v. South Carolina is significant because it limited states’ ability to A) Protect protestors. B) Restrict the freedom of speech. C) Convict criminals. D) Restrict the freedom of the press'. 27 March.

Reference

Academic.Tips. (2020, March 27). Edwards v. South Carolina is significant because it limited states’ ability to A) Protect protestors. B) Restrict the freedom of speech. C) Convict criminals. D) Restrict the freedom of the press. Retrieved from https://academic.tips/question/edwards-v-south-carolina/

References

Academic.Tips. 2020. "Edwards v. South Carolina is significant because it limited states’ ability to A) Protect protestors. B) Restrict the freedom of speech. C) Convict criminals. D) Restrict the freedom of the press." March 27, 2020. https://academic.tips/question/edwards-v-south-carolina/.

1. Academic.Tips. "Edwards v. South Carolina is significant because it limited states’ ability to A) Protect protestors. B) Restrict the freedom of speech. C) Convict criminals. D) Restrict the freedom of the press." March 27, 2020. https://academic.tips/question/edwards-v-south-carolina/.


Bibliography


Academic.Tips. "Edwards v. South Carolina is significant because it limited states’ ability to A) Protect protestors. B) Restrict the freedom of speech. C) Convict criminals. D) Restrict the freedom of the press." March 27, 2020. https://academic.tips/question/edwards-v-south-carolina/.

Work Cited

"Edwards v. South Carolina is significant because it limited states’ ability to A) Protect protestors. B) Restrict the freedom of speech. C) Convict criminals. D) Restrict the freedom of the press." Academic.Tips, 27 Mar. 2020, academic.tips/question/edwards-v-south-carolina/.

Copy