The main practical problem of bureaucracy is that it hinders and limits the government’s efficiency. The bureaucracy is the subject of the social process, a kind of aggregate person, uniting management personnel, performing on behalf of the state based on the legal framework created by him, numerous organizational functions in society. Bureaucratism is another matter because it is a particularly complicated type of regulatory activity, the basis of which is the state power itself and the specific power of the state units that stand out from it. The office and the powers exercised, strictly speaking, are clearly inscribed in the structure of existing power relations. Any attempts to eliminate them from these structures are associated with serious transformations of state power itself, as well as with possibly grave consequences of this step, up to the loss of controllability.
The primary philosophical issue lies in the fact that the given inefficiency results from distrust and the lack of reliability among functional compartments of the government. This is not surprising because the bureaucracy is not ideological but an organizational and technical phenomenon. It doesn’t matter which political system, ideology, and system of constitutional relations to serve, but the bureaucracy needs to do this technique perfectly, legally, impeccably, and rationally. Management experience and organizational sophistication are key factors that make the bureaucracy unsinkable and invulnerable. Tough measures against the bureaucracy failed. In addition, in organizations, institutions, and enterprises of various forms of ownership, a large managerial layer has developed in public associations of various organizational and legal forms. The scale and scope are not subject to centralized regulation, organized monitoring, and accounting, especially the rational impact.