Citizen review boards allow citizens to play a key role in investigating and overseeing police activities. However, some argue that civilians are not qualified to judge whether a police officer followed its agency’s rules or the law. Take a pro or con stance on citizen reviewboards and explain the benefit or drawback of their use. Provide examples to support your position.

Need a paper written? Our academic experts can create an original essay on any subject for ~~$13.00~~ $11/page Learn More

Citizen review boards can be viewed as a strategy for balancing power dynamics between police workers and civilians. However, evidence suggests that civilians, especially complainants, will never have their expectations met since their perception of the quality of police work is only affected by outcome rather than the appropriateness of the procedures themselves. For example, it is stated that “those who seek to have officers sanctioned will seldom have reason to feel satisfied, for if their complaints are not sustained, then no punishment is applied. Further, the majority of complainants who do not seek to have officers punished are still less likely to have their expectations met.”

In other words, citizen review boards might not be as useful as they seem to be since they do not provide a novel or more effective solution for making civilians satisfied with police work. However, such boards might still be useful for bringing more transparency to instances of “bad” policing, such as cases of unjustified brutality. Therefore, the overall impact of citizen review boards is minimal but still can be beneficial in rare and specific cases.

Rate the answer:

Further research on topic

Answer by Academic.tip's expert

An answer to this question is provided by one of our experts who specializes in law. Let us know how much you liked it and give it a rating.

Cite this page

Select a citation style:

References

Academic.Tips. (2022) 'Citizen review boards allow citizens to play a key role in investigating and overseeing police activities. However, some argue that civilians are not qualified to judge whether a police officer followed its agency’s rules or the law. Take a pro or con stance on citizen reviewboards and explain the benefit or drawback of their use. Provide examples to support your position'. 31 October.

Reference

Academic.Tips. (2022, October 31). Citizen review boards allow citizens to play a key role in investigating and overseeing police activities. However, some argue that civilians are not qualified to judge whether a police officer followed its agency’s rules or the law. Take a pro or con stance on citizen reviewboards and explain the benefit or drawback of their use. Provide examples to support your position. https://academic.tips/question/citizen-review-boards-allow-citizens-to-play-a-key-role-in-investigating-and-overseeing-police-activities-however-some-argue-that-civilians-are-not-qualified-to-judge-whether-a-police-officer-follow/

References

Academic.Tips. 2022. "Citizen review boards allow citizens to play a key role in investigating and overseeing police activities. However, some argue that civilians are not qualified to judge whether a police officer followed its agency’s rules or the law. Take a pro or con stance on citizen reviewboards and explain the benefit or drawback of their use. Provide examples to support your position." October 31, 2022. https://academic.tips/question/citizen-review-boards-allow-citizens-to-play-a-key-role-in-investigating-and-overseeing-police-activities-however-some-argue-that-civilians-are-not-qualified-to-judge-whether-a-police-officer-follow/.

1. Academic.Tips. "Citizen review boards allow citizens to play a key role in investigating and overseeing police activities. However, some argue that civilians are not qualified to judge whether a police officer followed its agency’s rules or the law. Take a pro or con stance on citizen reviewboards and explain the benefit or drawback of their use. Provide examples to support your position." October 31, 2022. https://academic.tips/question/citizen-review-boards-allow-citizens-to-play-a-key-role-in-investigating-and-overseeing-police-activities-however-some-argue-that-civilians-are-not-qualified-to-judge-whether-a-police-officer-follow/.

Bibliography

Academic.Tips. "Citizen review boards allow citizens to play a key role in investigating and overseeing police activities. However, some argue that civilians are not qualified to judge whether a police officer followed its agency’s rules or the law. Take a pro or con stance on citizen reviewboards and explain the benefit or drawback of their use. Provide examples to support your position." October 31, 2022. https://academic.tips/question/citizen-review-boards-allow-citizens-to-play-a-key-role-in-investigating-and-overseeing-police-activities-however-some-argue-that-civilians-are-not-qualified-to-judge-whether-a-police-officer-follow/.

Work Cited

"Citizen review boards allow citizens to play a key role in investigating and overseeing police activities. However, some argue that civilians are not qualified to judge whether a police officer followed its agency’s rules or the law. Take a pro or con stance on citizen reviewboards and explain the benefit or drawback of their use. Provide examples to support your position." Academic.Tips, 31 Oct. 2022, academic.tips/question/citizen-review-boards-allow-citizens-to-play-a-key-role-in-investigating-and-overseeing-police-activities-however-some-argue-that-civilians-are-not-qualified-to-judge-whether-a-police-officer-follow/.

Copy