A product is “unreasonably dangerous” when it is dangerous beyond expectations of the ordinary consumer. Whose expectations apply in the Calles v. Scripto-Tokai Corp. case? Why?

A

The Scripto-Tokai corporation manufactured utility lighters, which were intended for use around the household. As such, the tools could be expected to be safe for the application by adult family members and not accessible to children. As shown by the circumstances behind the cases discussed in this paper, children may sometimes gain access to tools that are not intended for their use. Thus, potentially dangerous instruments should have mechanisms in place to prevent unintended usage.

The parents are responsible for the safety of their children. So, the claim can be made that the manufacturer should not be liable for situations that arise from a mishandling of the product. Many different household tools and appliances can lead to harm if children are allowed access to them. The restriction of access to individuals who can use the items responsibly is the duty of the parents, and one can argue that failure to do so should be blamed on them.

Answer by Academic.tip's expert
An answer to this question is provided by one of our experts who specializes in law. Let us know how much you liked it and give it a rating.

Cite this page

Select a citation style:

References

Academic.Tips. (2021) 'A product is “unreasonably dangerous” when it is dangerous beyond expectations of the ordinary consumer. Whose expectations apply in the Calles v. Scripto-Tokai Corp. case? Why'. 22 June.

Reference

Academic.Tips. (2021, June 22). A product is “unreasonably dangerous” when it is dangerous beyond expectations of the ordinary consumer. Whose expectations apply in the Calles v. Scripto-Tokai Corp. case? Why? Retrieved from https://academic.tips/question/a-product-is-unreasonably-dangerous-when-it-is-dangerous-beyond-expectations-of-the-ordinary-consumer-whose-expectations-apply-in-the-calles-v-scripto-tokai-corp-case-why/

References

Academic.Tips. 2021. "A product is “unreasonably dangerous” when it is dangerous beyond expectations of the ordinary consumer. Whose expectations apply in the Calles v. Scripto-Tokai Corp. case? Why?" June 22, 2021. https://academic.tips/question/a-product-is-unreasonably-dangerous-when-it-is-dangerous-beyond-expectations-of-the-ordinary-consumer-whose-expectations-apply-in-the-calles-v-scripto-tokai-corp-case-why/.

1. Academic.Tips. "A product is “unreasonably dangerous” when it is dangerous beyond expectations of the ordinary consumer. Whose expectations apply in the Calles v. Scripto-Tokai Corp. case? Why?" June 22, 2021. https://academic.tips/question/a-product-is-unreasonably-dangerous-when-it-is-dangerous-beyond-expectations-of-the-ordinary-consumer-whose-expectations-apply-in-the-calles-v-scripto-tokai-corp-case-why/.


Bibliography


Academic.Tips. "A product is “unreasonably dangerous” when it is dangerous beyond expectations of the ordinary consumer. Whose expectations apply in the Calles v. Scripto-Tokai Corp. case? Why?" June 22, 2021. https://academic.tips/question/a-product-is-unreasonably-dangerous-when-it-is-dangerous-beyond-expectations-of-the-ordinary-consumer-whose-expectations-apply-in-the-calles-v-scripto-tokai-corp-case-why/.

Work Cited

"A product is “unreasonably dangerous” when it is dangerous beyond expectations of the ordinary consumer. Whose expectations apply in the Calles v. Scripto-Tokai Corp. case? Why?" Academic.Tips, 22 June 2021, academic.tips/question/a-product-is-unreasonably-dangerous-when-it-is-dangerous-beyond-expectations-of-the-ordinary-consumer-whose-expectations-apply-in-the-calles-v-scripto-tokai-corp-case-why/.

Copy