The model that Books Inc is adopting is for survival reasons in an environment ruled by big-box retail stores. The ecological niche is to identify itself with the local community at the expense of a larger market than Amazon.Com is exploiting cleverly. Amazon.Com has a blueprint that the environment selects. Handsome prices are offered by Amazon. Com puts it on the leading edge. The colossal stores give Amazon.Com a public character. Books Inc has a few stores in the Bay area and Disneyland and cannot reach out to the broader market. The ‘blueprint’ of small-sized stores and specific shopping for its stores is short-lived.
A completely opposite interpretation is that Books Inc. is just engaged in wishful thinking and that, while it might still be prospering. It does not significantly represent a whole brand new population. That is, Books Inc. is an exception rather than the rule, and in most cases, this is just the “wrong” blueprint, model and will eventually get selected out. What evidence supports this interpretation?
Cite this page
References
Academic.Tips. (2022) 'A completely opposite interpretation is that Books Inc. is just engaged in wishful thinking and that, while it might still be prospering. It does not significantly represent a whole brand new population. That is, Books Inc. is an exception rather than the rule, and in most cases, this is just the “wrong” blueprint, model and will eventually get selected out. What evidence supports this interpretation'. 3 February.
Reference
Academic.Tips. (2022, February 3). A completely opposite interpretation is that Books Inc. is just engaged in wishful thinking and that, while it might still be prospering. It does not significantly represent a whole brand new population. That is, Books Inc. is an exception rather than the rule, and in most cases, this is just the “wrong” blueprint, model and will eventually get selected out. What evidence supports this interpretation? https://academic.tips/question/a-completely-opposite-interpretation-is-that-books-inc-is-just-engaged-in-wishful-thinking-and-that-while-it-might-still-be-prospering-it-does-not-significantly-represent-a-whole-brand-new-populati/
References
Academic.Tips. 2022. "A completely opposite interpretation is that Books Inc. is just engaged in wishful thinking and that, while it might still be prospering. It does not significantly represent a whole brand new population. That is, Books Inc. is an exception rather than the rule, and in most cases, this is just the “wrong” blueprint, model and will eventually get selected out. What evidence supports this interpretation?" February 3, 2022. https://academic.tips/question/a-completely-opposite-interpretation-is-that-books-inc-is-just-engaged-in-wishful-thinking-and-that-while-it-might-still-be-prospering-it-does-not-significantly-represent-a-whole-brand-new-populati/.
1. Academic.Tips. "A completely opposite interpretation is that Books Inc. is just engaged in wishful thinking and that, while it might still be prospering. It does not significantly represent a whole brand new population. That is, Books Inc. is an exception rather than the rule, and in most cases, this is just the “wrong” blueprint, model and will eventually get selected out. What evidence supports this interpretation?" February 3, 2022. https://academic.tips/question/a-completely-opposite-interpretation-is-that-books-inc-is-just-engaged-in-wishful-thinking-and-that-while-it-might-still-be-prospering-it-does-not-significantly-represent-a-whole-brand-new-populati/.
Bibliography
Academic.Tips. "A completely opposite interpretation is that Books Inc. is just engaged in wishful thinking and that, while it might still be prospering. It does not significantly represent a whole brand new population. That is, Books Inc. is an exception rather than the rule, and in most cases, this is just the “wrong” blueprint, model and will eventually get selected out. What evidence supports this interpretation?" February 3, 2022. https://academic.tips/question/a-completely-opposite-interpretation-is-that-books-inc-is-just-engaged-in-wishful-thinking-and-that-while-it-might-still-be-prospering-it-does-not-significantly-represent-a-whole-brand-new-populati/.
Work Cited
"A completely opposite interpretation is that Books Inc. is just engaged in wishful thinking and that, while it might still be prospering. It does not significantly represent a whole brand new population. That is, Books Inc. is an exception rather than the rule, and in most cases, this is just the “wrong” blueprint, model and will eventually get selected out. What evidence supports this interpretation?" Academic.Tips, 3 Feb. 2022, academic.tips/question/a-completely-opposite-interpretation-is-that-books-inc-is-just-engaged-in-wishful-thinking-and-that-while-it-might-still-be-prospering-it-does-not-significantly-represent-a-whole-brand-new-populati/.